From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] qlge: New Qlogic 10Gb Ethernet Driver single patch Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:10:01 -0400 Message-ID: <48D27D59.4020105@garzik.org> References: <20080916203246.GA27264@susedev.qlogic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: NetDev To: Ron Mercer Return-path: Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:33830 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754326AbYIRQKF (ORCPT ); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 12:10:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080916203246.GA27264@susedev.qlogic.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ron Mercer wrote: >>>From c041fd2a648cc2685b21cb7e722ba9fb05be114e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ron Mercer > Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 12:17:52 -0700 > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] qlge: New Qlogic 10Gb Ethernet Driver. > > > Signed-off-by: Ron Mercer > --- > Documentation/networking/LICENSE.qlge | 46 + > MAINTAINERS | 7 + > drivers/net/Kconfig | 9 + > drivers/net/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/net/qlge/Makefile | 7 + > drivers/net/qlge/qlge.h | 1593 +++++++++++++ > drivers/net/qlge/qlge_dbg.c | 858 +++++++ > drivers/net/qlge/qlge_ethtool.c | 415 ++++ > drivers/net/qlge/qlge_main.c | 3954 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/net/qlge/qlge_mpi.c | 150 ++ > 10 files changed, 7040 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/networking/LICENSE.qlge > create mode 100644 drivers/net/qlge/Makefile > create mode 100644 drivers/net/qlge/qlge.h > create mode 100644 drivers/net/qlge/qlge_dbg.c > create mode 100644 drivers/net/qlge/qlge_ethtool.c > create mode 100644 drivers/net/qlge/qlge_main.c > create mode 100644 drivers/net/qlge/qlge_mpi.c applied, after fixing pci_dma_mapping_error() build breakage: you only used one argument, when calling pci_dma_mapping_error(). I'm guessing that (a) you did not build test this on multiple platforms, both 32-bit and 64-bit, or (b) you are building against an older version of the kernel? Either way, no big deal, I fixed it. But that's something to watch for next time. Your patches should always successfully build, ideally.