From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Subject: Re: patchwork for netdev
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:28:02 -0700
Message-ID: <48D2F212.50407@hp.com>
References: <20080918.165607.55765591.davem@davemloft.net>	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0809181700110.18136@shark.he.net> <20080918.170547.114615421.davem@davemloft.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: rdunlap@xenotime.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org,
	linville@tuxdriver.com
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from g1t0027.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.34]:11190 "EHLO
	g1t0027.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755811AbYISA2I (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 18 Sep 2008 20:28:08 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20080918.170547.114615421.davem@davemloft.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

> I was hoping those ACK emails would be one of the things I could stop
> doing if patchwork is effective.  Not immediately, but eventually.

Can't patchwork do that as those clicks to change state take place?

rick jones