From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarek Poplawski Subject: Re: NetDev! Please help! Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2008 18:11:37 +0200 Message-ID: <48D67239.9040006@gmail.com> References: <48D4F85C.8090709@bigtelecom.ru> <200809202111.01256.denys@visp.net.lb> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Badalian Vyacheslav , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Denys Fedoryshchenko Return-path: Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com ([72.14.220.153]:28383 "EHLO fg-out-1718.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751645AbYIUQHm (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 Sep 2008 12:07:42 -0400 Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 19so1095996fgg.17 for ; Sun, 21 Sep 2008 09:07:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <200809202111.01256.denys@visp.net.lb> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Denys Fedoryshchenko wrote, On 09/20/2008 08:11 PM: ... > P.S. For netdev, i have one more friend - who is complaining that shapers is > crashing on Intel machines (who uses TSC, he have two different "Core" based > servers, and both is crashing). With HPET i dont have any problem on high > performance shapers (except, that it is CPU expensive). It happens on latest > 2.6.26.5 too. Machine getting hard lockup, and nothing than hardware watchdog > able to recover it. They dont have experience to get actual reason of this > issue and they dont know english well to report this issue. Is your friend sure it's because of shapers? If he/she can patch there is no need to know English well to report here: Subject: 2.6.26.5 tc not OK Config: .config tc script: script dmesg: dmesg not OK when: script run/script not run patch #1 not OK patch #2 not OK ... patch #2001 OK! Jarek P.