From: Cedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com>
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>,
Denis Lunev <den@openvz.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
ebiederm@xmission.com, benjamin.thery@bull.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] [RFC] netns: enable cross-ve Unix sockets
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 15:08:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E37637.8080408@fr.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48E36FDA.5090808@openvz.org>
Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
>>>> So there are 2 cases:
>>>> * full isolation : restriction on VPS
>>>> * partial isolation : no restriction but *perhaps* problem when migrating
>>>>
>>>> Looks like we need an option per namespace to reduce the isolation for
>>>> af_unix sockets :)
>>>> - on (default): current behaviour => full isolation
>>>> - off : partial isolation
>>> You mean some sysctl, that enables/disables this check in unix_find_socket_byinode?
>> Yes.
>
> OK. Den, please, do :)
hmm, would that allow sibling namespaces to connect to each other ? If so,
I'm not in favor of such a solution.
I understand the need. we had a similar issue with the command line tool
pgsl. Could we work something out with the capabilities ? or make an
exception if your ->nsproxy->net_ns == init_net ?
Thanks,
C.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-01 13:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-01 10:54 [PATCH net-next] [RFC] netns: enable cross-ve Unix sockets Denis V. Lunev
2008-10-01 11:13 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-01 11:32 ` Denis V. Lunev
2008-10-01 11:55 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <48E3653C.1070701-NmTC/0ZBporQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-10-01 12:03 ` Denis V. Lunev
2008-10-01 12:19 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-01 12:24 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-10-01 12:31 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-01 12:40 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-10-01 13:08 ` Cedric Le Goater [this message]
2008-10-01 13:50 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-01 15:07 ` Cedric Le Goater
2008-10-01 13:11 ` Denis V. Lunev
2008-10-01 13:46 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-01 14:54 ` Denis V. Lunev
2008-10-01 15:18 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-01 15:31 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-10-01 15:38 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-01 15:42 ` Pavel Emelyanov
2008-10-01 16:15 ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-02 10:21 ` Denis V. Lunev
2008-10-02 20:03 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E37637.8080408@fr.ibm.com \
--to=clg@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=benjamin.thery@bull.net \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xemul@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).