From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] [RFC] netns: enable cross-ve Unix sockets Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 19:31:13 +0400 Message-ID: <48E397C1.6050407@openvz.org> References: <1222858454-7843-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org> <48E35B4C.1040303@fr.ibm.com> <1222860776.23573.49.camel@iris.sw.ru> <48E3653C.1070701@fr.ibm.com> <1222862583.23573.54.camel@iris.sw.ru> <48E36ABF.8030908@fr.ibm.com> <48E36BFA.3040904@openvz.org> <48E36DA0.9080400@fr.ibm.com> <1222866717.23573.58.camel@iris.sw.ru> <48E37F1B.20601@fr.ibm.com> <1222872885.23573.64.camel@iris.sw.ru> <48E394D2.5090709@fr.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Denis V. Lunev" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, benjamin.thery@bull.net, ebiederm@xmission.com To: Daniel Lezcano Return-path: Received: from sacred.ru ([62.205.161.221]:39250 "EHLO sacred.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750901AbYJAPe1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Oct 2008 11:34:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <48E394D2.5090709@fr.ibm.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > Yes per namespace, I agree. > > If the option is controlled by the parent and it is done by sysctl, you > will have to make proc/sys per namespace like Pavel did with /proc/net, no ? /proc/sys is already per namespace actually ;) Or what did you mean by that?