netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@bull.net>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: deadlock during net device unregistration - V2
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2008 17:23:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E4E772.2020208@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081001233152.GA2411@ami.dom.local>

Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 11:06:22PM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Jarek Poplawski wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 01, 2008 at 04:14:35PM +0200, Benjamin Thery wrote:
> ...
>>>> --- net-next-2.6.orig/net/core/dst.c
>>>> +++ net-next-2.6/net/core/dst.c
>>>> @@ -328,6 +328,10 @@ static int dst_dev_event(struct notifier
>>>>  			dst_ifdown(dst, dev, event != NETDEV_DOWN);
>>>>  		}
>>>>  		mutex_unlock(&dst_gc_mutex);
>>>> +
>>>> +		if (event == NETDEV_UNREGISTER &&
>>>> +		    cancel_delayed_work(&dst_gc_work))
>>>> +			dst_gc_task(&dst_gc_work.work);
>>> Hmm... It seems this shouldn't work yet: cancel_delayed_work() can only
>>> kill this while on timer, but not when queued and maybe blocked already.

You're right.

> 
> Hmm#2... Then maybe something like this?:
> 
> 		if (event == NETDEV_UNREGISTER &&
> 	    	    (cancel_delayed_work(&dst_gc_work) ||
> 		     delayed_work_pending(&dst_gc_work)))
> 			dst_gc_task(&dst_gc_work.work);

Hmmm... I'm not sure I understand what this change do?

OK, I see this ensure we will run dst_gc_task() even if
cancel_delayed_work() failed and the work is still pending (ie. the 
timer has expired and dst_gc_work is already in the queue).

But what if the work was not pending at all at beginning?
We still need to run dst_gc_task().

Is something like this better?
(code expanded to be more readable)

	if (event == NETDEV_UNREGISTER) {
	    if (!delayed_work_pending(&dst_gc_work))
	        /* work is not scheduled (no timer, not in queue) */
		dst_gc_task(&dst_gc_work.work);
	    else if (cancel_delayed_work(&dst_gc_work) ||
  	             delayed_work_pending(&dst_gc_work)))
                 /* work was scheduled (and may be blocked) */
  	        dst_gc_task(&dst_gc_work.work);
	    else
                 /* dst_gc_task() is running, do nothing */
	}

Benjamin



> 
> 
> Jarek P.
> 
> 


-- 
B e n j a m i n   T h e r y  - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D

    http://www.bull.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-02 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20080929175412.866679567@theryb.frec.bull.fr>
2008-09-29 17:54 ` [PATCH] net: deadlock during net device unregistration Benjamin Thery
2008-09-30  6:32   ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-09-30 11:52     ` Benjamin Thery
2008-09-30 13:58       ` David Miller
2008-09-30 14:07         ` Benjamin Thery
2008-09-30 14:42       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-09-30 14:57         ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-09-30 15:18           ` Benjamin Thery
2008-10-01  9:59             ` David Miller
2008-10-01 10:10               ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-01 10:12                 ` David Miller
2008-10-01 14:14                   ` [PATCH] net: deadlock during net device unregistration - V2 Benjamin Thery
2008-10-01 19:48                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-01 21:06                       ` Daniel Lezcano
2008-10-01 21:52                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-01 23:31                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-02 15:23                           ` Benjamin Thery [this message]
2008-10-02 18:38                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-02 19:55                               ` Benjamin Thery 
2008-10-02 20:34                                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-04  7:42                                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-04  7:52                                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-03  0:41   ` [PATCH] net: deadlock during net device unregistration Eric W. Biederman
2008-10-05  4:26   ` Herbert Xu
2008-10-05  6:55     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-05  6:56       ` Herbert Xu
2008-10-05  7:12         ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-05  7:28           ` Stephen Hemminger
2008-10-05  7:38             ` Herbert Xu
2008-10-05  7:39           ` Herbert Xu
2008-10-06 15:19     ` Benjamin Thery
2008-10-07 22:46       ` David Miller
2008-10-07 22:50     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48E4E772.2020208@bull.net \
    --to=benjamin.thery@bull.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dlezcano@fr.ibm.com \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).