netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Possible regression in HTB
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:03:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <48EB4FFC.2020107@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081007074435.GA2700@ff.dom.local>

Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 03:51:47PM +1100, Simon Horman wrote:
>> With the following patch (basically a reversal of ""pkt_sched: Always use
>> q->requeue in dev_requeue_skb()" forward ported to the current
>> net-next-2.6 tree (tcp: Respect SO_RCVLOWAT in tcp_poll()), I get some
>> rather nice numbers (IMHO).
>>
>> 10194: 666780666bits/s 666Mbits/s
>> 10197: 141154197bits/s 141Mbits/s
>> 10196: 141023090bits/s 141Mbits/s
>> -----------------------------------
>> total: 948957954bits/s 948Mbits/s
>>
>> I'm not sure what evil things this patch does to other aspects
>> of the qdisc code.
> 
> I'd like to establish this too. This patch was meant to remove some
> other problems possibly the simplest way. Maybe it's too simple.
> Anyway, it's kind of RFC, so the rest of the requeuing code is left
> unchanged, just for easy revoking like below. But first we should
> try to understand this more.

Shooting in the dark: I don't see how this change could affect
the bandwidth expect by introducing higher dequeue-latency due
using netif_schedule instead of qdisc_watchdog. Does anyone know
how device scheduling latencies compare to hrtimers?


  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-07 12:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-07  1:15 Possible regression in HTB Simon Horman
2008-10-07  4:51 ` Simon Horman
2008-10-07  7:44   ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-07 12:03     ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2008-10-08  0:09     ` Simon Horman
2008-10-08  6:37       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-08  7:22         ` Simon Horman
2008-10-08  7:53           ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-07 12:20   ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-07 12:48     ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-07 22:00       ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-08  0:21         ` Simon Horman
2008-10-08  0:31           ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-08  0:40             ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-08  7:34               ` Martin Devera
2008-10-08  8:53                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-08 10:47                   ` Martin Devera
2008-10-08 12:04                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-09  1:09                     ` Simon Horman
2008-10-09  6:22                       ` Martin Devera
2008-10-09  9:56                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-09 10:14                           ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-09 10:52                           ` Martin Devera
2008-10-09 11:04                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-09 11:11                         ` Simon Horman
2008-10-09 11:22                           ` Martin Devera
2008-10-08  6:55             ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-08  7:06               ` Denys Fedoryshchenko
2008-10-08  7:46                 ` [PATCH] " Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-08 18:36                   ` David Miller
2008-10-08  7:22               ` Simon Horman
2008-10-08  8:03                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-09  0:54                   ` Simon Horman
2008-10-09  6:21                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-09  6:53                       ` Martin Devera
2008-10-09 11:18                       ` Simon Horman
2008-10-09 11:58                         ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-09 12:36                         ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-10  6:59         ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-10  8:57           ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-10 12:12             ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-08  0:10     ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=48EB4FFC.2020107@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).