[RFC, PATCH] udp: complete port availability checking

[RFC, PATCH] udp: complete port availability checking

[Eric Dumazet]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 332 bytes --]

While looking at UDP port randomization, I noticed it
was litle bit pessimistic, not looking at type of sockets
(IPV6/IPV4) and not looking at bound addresses if any.

We should perform same tests than when binding to a
specific port.

This permits a cleanup of udp_lib_get_port()

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>

[-- Attachment #2: udp_inuse.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2718 bytes --]

diff --git a/net/ipv4/udp.c b/net/ipv4/udp.c
index 67d8430..eacf4cf 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/udp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c
@@ -122,14 +122,23 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(sysctl_udp_wmem_min);
 atomic_t udp_memory_allocated;
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(udp_memory_allocated);
 
-static inline int __udp_lib_lport_inuse(struct net *net, __u16 num,
-					const struct hlist_head udptable[])
+static int udp_lib_lport_inuse(struct net *net, __u16 num,
+			       const struct hlist_head udptable[],
+			       struct sock *sk,
+			       int (*saddr_comp)(const struct sock *sk1,
+						 const struct sock *sk2))
 {
-	struct sock *sk;
+	struct sock *sk2;
 	struct hlist_node *node;
 
-	sk_for_each(sk, node, &udptable[udp_hashfn(net, num)])
-		if (net_eq(sock_net(sk), net) && sk->sk_hash == num)
+	sk_for_each(sk2, node, &udptable[udp_hashfn(net, num)])
+		if (net_eq(sock_net(sk2), net)			&&
+		    sk2 != sk					&&
+		    sk2->sk_hash == num				&&
+		    (!sk2->sk_reuse || !sk->sk_reuse)		&&
+		    (!sk2->sk_bound_dev_if || !sk->sk_bound_dev_if
+			|| sk2->sk_bound_dev_if == sk->sk_bound_dev_if) &&
+		    (*saddr_comp)(sk, sk2))
 			return 1;
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -146,9 +155,6 @@ int udp_lib_get_port(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum,
 					 const struct sock *sk2 )    )
 {
 	struct hlist_head *udptable = sk->sk_prot->h.udp_hash;
-	struct hlist_node *node;
-	struct hlist_head *head;
-	struct sock *sk2;
 	int    error = 1;
 	struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
 
@@ -165,32 +171,21 @@ int udp_lib_get_port(struct sock *sk, unsigned short snum,
 		rand = net_random();
 		snum = first = rand % remaining + low;
 		rand |= 1;
-		while (__udp_lib_lport_inuse(net, snum, udptable)) {
+		while (udp_lib_lport_inuse(net, snum, udptable, sk,
+					   saddr_comp)) {
 			do {
 				snum = snum + rand;
 			} while (snum < low || snum > high);
 			if (snum == first)
 				goto fail;
 		}
-	} else {
-		head = &udptable[udp_hashfn(net, snum)];
-
-		sk_for_each(sk2, node, head)
-			if (sk2->sk_hash == snum                             &&
-			    sk2 != sk                                        &&
-			    net_eq(sock_net(sk2), net)			     &&
-			    (!sk2->sk_reuse        || !sk->sk_reuse)         &&
-			    (!sk2->sk_bound_dev_if || !sk->sk_bound_dev_if
-			     || sk2->sk_bound_dev_if == sk->sk_bound_dev_if) &&
-			    (*saddr_comp)(sk, sk2)                             )
-				goto fail;
-	}
+	} else if (udp_lib_lport_inuse(net, snum, udptable, sk, saddr_comp))
+		goto fail;
 
 	inet_sk(sk)->num = snum;
 	sk->sk_hash = snum;
 	if (sk_unhashed(sk)) {
-		head = &udptable[udp_hashfn(net, snum)];
-		sk_add_node(sk, head);
+		sk_add_node(sk, &udptable[udp_hashfn(net, snum)]);
 		sock_prot_inuse_add(sock_net(sk), sk->sk_prot, 1);
 	}
 	error = 0;

Re: [RFC, PATCH] udp: complete port availability checking

[David Miller]

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:31:32 +0200

> While looking at UDP port randomization, I noticed it
> was litle bit pessimistic, not looking at type of sockets
> (IPV6/IPV4) and not looking at bound addresses if any.
> 
> We should perform same tests than when binding to a
> specific port.
> 
> This permits a cleanup of udp_lib_get_port()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>

This looks fine to me but I'd like some other eyeballs on
this one before I apply it.

Re: [RFC, PATCH] udp: complete port availability checking

[David Miller]

From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 00:31:32 +0200

> While looking at UDP port randomization, I noticed it
> was litle bit pessimistic, not looking at type of sockets
> (IPV6/IPV4) and not looking at bound addresses if any.
> 
> We should perform same tests than when binding to a
> specific port.
> 
> This permits a cleanup of udp_lib_get_port()
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>

Applied, thanks Eric.