From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14]: Killing qdisc->ops->requeue().
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:41:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F4CBBA.7070004@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081014095246.GA10804@ff.dom.local>
Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> The aim of this patch-set is to finish changes proposed by David S.
> Miller in his patch-set with the same subject from Mon, 18 Aug 2008.
> The first two patches were applied with some modifications, so, to
> apply the rest, there were needed some changes.
>
> Original David's patches include additional info, but signed-off-by
> is removed because of changed context. I expect they will be merged
> and signed off by David as an author, anyway.
>
> The qdisc->requeue list idea is to limit requeuing to one level only,
> so a parent can requeue to its child only. This list is then tried
> first while dequeuing (qdisc_dequeue()), except at the top level,
> so packets could be requeued only by qdiscs, not by qdisc_restart()
> after xmit errors.
I still do not agree with this change. It essentially breaks multiq as
we are right back to all queues being stopped because of one packet in
the qdisc->requeue list.
I think if anything it seems like you guys actually found the cpu
performance issue a while back in the fact that the dev_requeue_skb was
calling __netif_schedule when requeuing on a stopped queue. That is the
one piece I would say needs to be changed so that you only call
__netif_schedule if the skb is not going to a stopped queue.
Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-14 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-14 9:52 [PATCH 00/14]: Killing qdisc->ops->requeue() Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 11:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-14 12:26 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 12:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-14 17:56 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 20:18 ` David Miller
2008-10-14 20:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-15 8:27 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-15 9:45 ` Patrick McHardy
2008-10-14 16:41 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2008-10-14 18:37 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 18:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 19:15 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-14 20:37 ` Alexander Duyck
2008-10-15 6:45 ` Jarek Poplawski
2008-10-15 7:19 ` Jarek Poplawski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48F4CBBA.7070004@intel.com \
--to=alexander.h.duyck@intel.com \
--cc=jarkao2@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).