From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Cc: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Octavian Purdila <opurdila@ixiacom.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>,
Ingo Oeser <netdev@axxeo.de>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>
Subject: Re: hardware time stamps + existing time stamp usage
Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 09:38:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F99286.9050706@hartkopp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48F96DD6.5060904@cosmosbay.com>
Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> Interesting stuff :)
>
Indeed.
> 1) You want hardware TX stamping on all frames sent behalf a given socket
> Mark a WANT_HARDWARE_TX_STAMP flag at socket level
> Copy this flag when generating skb for this socket.
> When transmitting WANT_HARDWARE_TX_STAMP tagged frame to device,
> dont feed it to dev_queue_xmit_nit() in dev_hard_start_xmit()
> In NIC driver tx completion, test skb WANT_HARDWARE_TX_STAMP flag.
> If set, get tstamp from hardware and copy it to skb tstamp,
> and call dev_queue_xmit_nit() (we might avoid cloning skb there, since
> nic driver doesnt need it anymore)
>
> This flag could also be set at device level, for all sent frames.
> (tcpdump new option)
>
> 2) You want hardware RX stamping on a particular device, yet being
> able to
> deliver system time to legacy apps, unaware of hardware tstamps.
>
> Set a global flag on device, telling linux stack this device feeds
> hardware stamp.
> In driver RX completion, set skb tstamp with hardware stamps.
>
> Mark a WANT_HARDWARE_RX_STAMP flag at socket level, for PTP
> applications.
>
> In recv(), if current socket is not marked WANT_HARDWARE_RX_STAMP
> and device has
> the global flag set, copy system time in tstamp, overrinding
> hardware tstamp.
>
>
Looks good to me. Just one question regarding
'copy system time in tstamp, overrinding hardware tstamp':
When recv() delivers to several sockets there would be probably
*different* system time values copied and delivered for the *same* skb,
right?
If so i would tend to fill both (system time and hw timestamp) on driver
level into the skb and then decide on socket level what to push into
user space as you suggested above.
Regards,
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-18 7:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-17 14:23 hardware time stamps + existing time stamp usage Patrick Ohly
2008-10-18 5:02 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-10-18 7:38 ` Oliver Hartkopp [this message]
2008-10-18 8:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-10-18 10:10 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-10-20 7:35 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-10-20 18:01 ` Oliver Hartkopp
2008-10-21 7:29 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-10-18 19:37 ` Octavian Purdila
2008-10-20 12:27 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-10-20 13:07 ` Octavian Purdila
2008-10-20 13:37 ` Patrick Ohly
2008-10-21 7:04 ` Andi Kleen
2008-10-21 7:40 ` Patrick Ohly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48F99286.9050706@hartkopp.net \
--to=oliver@hartkopp.net \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@axxeo.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=opurdila@ixiacom.com \
--cc=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).