From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?D=E2niel?= Fraga Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp FRTO: in-order-only "TCP proxy" fragility workaround (fwd) Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 14:52:50 -0300 Message-ID: <48e8fef7.0610c00a.5fa2.ffffaab0@mx.google.com> References: <48e3a4e5.0d1d640a.4cd3.06e9@mx.google.com> <48e3e835.0906c00a.2cd1.2fd1@mx.google.com> <48e4adb8.0807c00a.62b8.ffff87d6@mx.google.com> <48e4d63a.060ec00a.6a4e.ffff95bf@mx.google.com> <48e5364d.0603c00a.6e25.fffff993@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Thomas Gleixner , David Miller , Netdev To: "Ilpo =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E4rvinen?=" Return-path: Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com ([74.125.92.27]:33101 "EHLO qw-out-2122.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754700AbYJERw7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Oct 2008 13:52:59 -0400 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 3so520065qwe.37 for ; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 10:52:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, 3 Oct 2008 00:19:08 +0300 (EEST) "Ilpo J=E4rvinen" wrote: > On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, D=E2niel Fraga wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 23:31:28 +0300 (EEST) > > "Ilpo J=E4rvinen" wrote: > >=20 > > > Ah, I was kind of thinking that you were doing something net rela= ted=20 > > > using some raw socket thing (such as traceroute) when you earlier= =20 > > > mentioned sudo (iirc, we never really discussed what you usually = do with=20 > > > it when you see the stall). > >=20 > > I read nntp groups everyday and I use leafnode. The stall on my > > desktop happens when I run fetchnews (which must be run as user "ne= ws" > > so I have to use sudo). Usually the stall on my desktop happens whe= n > > I'm using fetchnews or some other command run by sudo. >=20 > Yes yes, I'd be specificly interested to have some rough idea what th= at > "some other command" includes, especially as some seem to be non-net=20 > related since you mentioned e.g., that /dev/log thing? Here we go folks, good and bad news: 1) the good news is that the Thomas' patch detected the stall, but... 2) Oct 5 14:23:03 teleporto vmunix: Tracer stopped Oct 5 14:23:13 teleporto last message repeated 2 times if it had really stopped, the message wouldn't be repeated 2 times. and fraga@teleporto ~$ cat /debug/tracing/tracing_enabled=20 1 In other words, the tracing wasn't really stopped. So I couldn't get what Thomas want. Should I activated the initial auto-checking of ftrace to see if it's really working? Very strange the fact it wasn't stopped. *** I was waiting for 2 days to a stall and I managed to get the stall by using "sudo" multiple times. It seems that sudo really makes this bug hit. =09 And now? Should we revise Thomas patch? Maybe a bug in ftrace code that prevents it from being stopped? It seems that: ftrace_enabled =3D 0; isn't really stopping the tracing. Thank you. --=20