From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alexandre Torgue Subject: Re: [patch net-next] stmmac: indent an if statement Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2017 09:25:21 +0100 Message-ID: <4902e86a-6a86-57d6-51c2-55e391b83dc3@st.com> References: <20170112184631.GA12157@mwanda> <20170115.221438.1956356112755181222.davem@davemloft.net> <20170116091924.GA4104@mwanda> <20170116093954.GB4104@mwanda> <20170116215615.GG4104@mwanda> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , , , , , To: Julia Lawall , Dan Carpenter Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Hi Julia On 01/16/2017 11:10 PM, Julia Lawall wrote: > > > On Tue, 17 Jan 2017, Dan Carpenter wrote: > >> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:46:22PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, 16 Jan 2017, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>> >>>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:19:24PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >>>>> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 10:14:38PM -0500, David Miller wrote: >>>>>> From: Dan Carpenter >>>>>> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 21:46:32 +0300 >>>>>> >>>>>>> The break statement should be indented one more tab. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter >>>>>> >>>>>> Applied, but like Julia I think we might have a missing of_node_put() >>>>>> here. >>>>> >>>>> Of course, sorry for dropping the ball on this. I'll send a patch for >>>>> that. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Actually, I've looked at it some more and I think this function is OK. >>>> We're supposed to do an of_node_put() later... I can't find where that >>>> happens, but presumably that's because I don't know stmmac well. This >>>> code here, though, is fine. >>> >>> Why do you think it is fine? Does anyone in the calling context know >>> which child would have caused the break? >> >> Yeah. It's saved in plat->mdio_node and we expect to be holding on >> either path through the function. >> >> (It would be better if one of the stmmac people were responding here >> insead of a random fix the indenting weenie like myself.) > > OK, I agree that there should not be an of_node_put with the break. > > Perhaps there should be an of_node_put on plat->mdio_node in > stmmac_remove_config_dt, like there is an of_node_put on plat->phy_node. > But it would certainly be helpful to hear from someone who knows the code > better. I also think it's missing! Can you propose a patch ? br Alex > > julia >