netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@bull.net>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ipv6: fix run pending DAD when interface becomes ready
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 11:28:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4911755C.4030504@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081105.014446.140069453.davem@davemloft.net>

David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:51:22 -0800 (PST)
> 
>> From: Benjamin Thery <benjamin.thery@bull.net>
>> Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 14:55:50 +0100
>>
>>> I think there's a bug in net/ipv6/addrconf.c, addrconf_notify():
>>> addrconf_dad_run() is not always run when the interface is flagged IF_READY.
>>> Currently it is only run when receiving NETDEV_CHANGE event. Looks like
>>> some (virtual) devices doesn't send this event when becoming up.
>>>
>>> For both NETDEV_UP and NETDEV_CHANGE events, when the interface becomes
>>> ready, run_pending should be set to 1. Patch below.
>>>
>>> 'run_pending = 1' could be moved below the if/else block but it makes 
>>> the code less readable.

>> I wonder if we should instead make the virtual devices emit
>> the missing event?

I don't know. We'll have to identify all the devices that (mis)behave
like this.
Are all the devices supposed to emit both NETDEV_UP and NETDEV_CHANGE
when ifconfig/ip commands set the devices up?


But as you state below, it also looked more logical to me to run 
addrconf_dad_run() on every events that causes the interface to become
ready.

Benjamin

> 
> In any event, for the time being, I'm going to apply
> Benjamin's patch to fix this problem.
> 
> It makes the function in question logically consistent
> in that now everything that can cause IF_READY to become
> set will also cause run_pending work to run.

This is how

> 
> 


-- 
B e n j a m i n   T h e r y  - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D

    http://www.bull.com

      reply	other threads:[~2008-11-05 10:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20081104135549.981972492@nptl.frec.bull.fr>
2008-11-04 13:55 ` [PATCH] ipv6: fix run pending DAD when interface becomes ready Benjamin Thery
2008-11-04 22:51   ` David Miller
2008-11-05  9:44     ` David Miller
2008-11-05 10:28       ` Benjamin Thery [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4911755C.4030504@bull.net \
    --to=benjamin.thery@bull.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).