From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Newall Subject: Re: time for TCP ECN defaulting to on? Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:15:55 +1030 Message-ID: <491454A3.1040802@davidnewall.com> References: <6278d2220811040632u7a36d68ekad5de517fd0671bb@mail.gmail.com> <20081105.151015.206163697.davem@davemloft.net> <4914240F.7050701@blueteddy.net> <20081107142950.13906925@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Dave Hudson , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ilpo_J=E4r?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?vinen?= , Mikael Abrahamsson , David Miller , daniel.blueman@gmail.com, LKML , Netdev , linux-net@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081107142950.13906925@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Isn't this a question for the IETF to answer? Are they saying turn on ECN now?