netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
To: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [proposed patch] via-rhine: prevent oops when requesting an IRQ
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:35:14 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4918B722.8020703@garzik.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081110172836.0aaec702@redhat.com>

Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:07:41 -0500
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
> 
>> Chuck Ebbert wrote:
>>> via-rhine: prevent oops when requesting an IRQ
>>>
>>> via-rhine requests an IRQ before it's ready to handle an interrupt.
>>> It oopses when CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ is enabled.
>>>
>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469303
>>>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> NOTE: UNTESTED: Is it okay to init the hardware before requesting the
>>> IRQ, or should that be done afterward?
>> First of all, _ideally_ your interrupt handler should be able to any 
>> state of software initialization, once registers are mapped.  So I would 
>> first concentrate on "hardening" the interrupt handler, if feasible.
>>
>> It is certainly a common technique to disable interrupts somehow, during 
>> initialization of the hardware.  Note, though, that doing things before 
>> request_irq() is no real guarantee you are out of danger -- you might be 
>> on a shared PCI irq, and your init causes that interrupt to "scream" 
>> even though your driver has not registered the irq.
>>
> 
> The problem with this driver is that it doesn't call alloc_ring() before
> request_irq() and then it oopses in the interrupt handler trying to access
> the ring.

Allocation should definitely occur prior to request_irq()

	Jeff



      reply	other threads:[~2008-11-10 22:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-05  0:23 [proposed patch] via-rhine: prevent oops when requesting an IRQ Chuck Ebbert
2008-11-06  6:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-11-10 22:28   ` Chuck Ebbert
2008-11-10 22:35     ` Jeff Garzik [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4918B722.8020703@garzik.org \
    --to=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).