From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, shemminger@vyatta.com, "Zhang,
Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] net: make sure struct dst_entry refcount is aligned on 64 bytes
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:47:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <491D5725.50006@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081114093613.GA2834@x200.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2793 bytes --]
Alexey Dobriyan a écrit :
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 10:04:24AM +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> David Miller a écrit :
>>> From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
>>> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:09:31 +0100
>>>
>>>> During tbench/oprofile sessions, I found that dst_release() was in third position.
>>> ...
>>>> Instead of first checking the refcount value, then decrement it,
>>>> we use atomic_dec_return() to help CPU to make the right memory transaction
>>>> (ie getting the cache line in exclusive mode)
>>> ...
>>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
>>> This looks great, applied, thanks Eric.
>>>
>> Thanks David
>>
>>
>> I think I understood some regressions here on 32bits
>>
>> offsetof(struct dst_entry, __refcnt) is 0x7c again !!!
>>
>> This is really really bad for performance
>>
>> I believe this comes from a patch from Alexey Dobriyan
>> (commit def8b4faff5ca349beafbbfeb2c51f3602a6ef3a
>> net: reduce structures when XFRM=n)
>
> Ick.
Well, your patch is a good thing, we only need to make adjustments.
>
>> This kills effort from Zhang Yanmin (and me...)
>>
>> (commit f1dd9c379cac7d5a76259e7dffcd5f8edc697d17
>> [NET]: Fix tbench regression in 2.6.25-rc1)
>>
>>
>> Really we must find something so that this damned __refcnt is starting at 0x80
>
> Make it last member?
Yes, it will help tbench, but not machines that stress IP route cache
(dst_use() must dirty the three fields "refcnt, __use , lastuse" )
Also, 'next' pointer should be in the same cache line, to speedup route
cache lookups.
Next problem is that offsets depend on architecture being 32 or 64 bits.
On 64bit, offsetof(struct dst_entry, __refcnt) is 0xb0 : not very good...
[PATCH] net: make sure struct dst_entry refcount is aligned on 64 bytes
As found in the past (commit f1dd9c379cac7d5a76259e7dffcd5f8edc697d17
[NET]: Fix tbench regression in 2.6.25-rc1), it is really
important that struct dst_entry refcount is aligned on a cache line.
We cannot use __atribute((aligned)), so manually pad the structure
for 32 and 64 bit arches.
for 32bit : offsetof(truct dst_entry, __refcnt) is 0x80
for 64bit : offsetof(truct dst_entry, __refcnt) is 0xc0
As it is not possible to guess at compile time cache line size,
we use a generic value of 64 bytes, that satisfies many current arches.
(Using 128 bytes alignment on 64bit arches would waste 64 bytes)
Add a BUILD_BUG_ON to catch future updates to "struct dst_entry" dont
break this alignment.
"tbench 8" is 4.4 % faster on a dual quad core (HP BL460c G1), Intel E5450 @3.00GHz
(2350 MB/s instead of 2250 MB/s)
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
---
include/net/dst.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
1 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
[-- Attachment #2: dst_align.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1127 bytes --]
diff --git a/include/net/dst.h b/include/net/dst.h
index 65a60fa..6c77879 100644
--- a/include/net/dst.h
+++ b/include/net/dst.h
@@ -61,6 +61,8 @@ struct dst_entry
struct hh_cache *hh;
#ifdef CONFIG_XFRM
struct xfrm_state *xfrm;
+#else
+ void *__pad1;
#endif
int (*input)(struct sk_buff*);
int (*output)(struct sk_buff*);
@@ -71,8 +73,20 @@ struct dst_entry
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ROUTE
__u32 tclassid;
+#else
+ __u32 __pad2;
#endif
+
+ /*
+ * Align __refcnt to a 64 bytes alignment
+ * (L1_CACHE_SIZE would be too much)
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+ long __pad_to_align_refcnt[2];
+#else
+ long __pad_to_align_refcnt[1];
+#endif
/*
* __refcnt wants to be on a different cache line from
* input/output/ops or performance tanks badly
@@ -157,6 +171,11 @@ dst_metric_locked(struct dst_entry *dst, int metric)
static inline void dst_hold(struct dst_entry * dst)
{
+ /*
+ * If your kernel compilation stops here, please check
+ * __pad_to_align_refcnt declaration in struct dst_entry
+ */
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct dst_entry, __refcnt) & 63);
atomic_inc(&dst->__refcnt);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-14 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-14 8:09 [PATCH] net: speedup dst_release() Eric Dumazet
2008-11-14 8:54 ` David Miller
2008-11-14 9:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-11-14 9:36 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-11-14 10:47 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2008-11-14 11:35 ` [PATCH] net: make sure struct dst_entry refcount is aligned on 64 bytes Alexey Dobriyan
2008-11-14 11:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-11-14 13:22 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2008-11-14 13:37 ` Eric Dumazet
2008-11-17 3:46 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=491D5725.50006@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).