From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 21:28:03 +0100
Message-ID: <49232553.4050300@krogh.cc>
References: <491FEAD5.4090205@krogh.cc> <17663.1226965523@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> <49232489.4000504@krogh.cc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 2605ds1-ynoe.1.fullrate.dk ([90.184.12.24]:50132 "EHLO
	shrek.krogh.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752439AbYKRU15 (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:27:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <49232489.4000504@krogh.cc>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Jesper Krogh wrote:
> Jay Vosburgh wrote:
>> Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc> wrote:
>>
>>> I have something that looks like a regression in bonding between 
>>> 2.6.26.8
>>> and 2.6.27.6 (I'll try the mid-steps later).
> 
> There was something about that rc-27 could ruin my Intel NICs.. right? 
> (I'll refrain from testing with those then).

I'll try that anyway.. I dont have any Intel NIC's in this server. 
(sorry about the confusion).

-- 
Jesper