From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] xfrm: Cleanup for unlink SPD entry
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2008 17:57:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4933B507.3020101@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4933B488.3000406@cn.fujitsu.com>
Sorry, the title should be this:
[PATCH 2/2] xfrm: Cleanup for unlink SPD entry
Wei Yongjun wrote:
> Used __xfrm_policy_unlink() to instead of the dup codes when unlink
> SPD entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 36 ++++++++++--------------------------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> index fb216c9..0de2e1f 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,9 @@ static struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *xfrm_policy_get_afinfo(unsigned short family);
> static void xfrm_policy_put_afinfo(struct xfrm_policy_afinfo *afinfo);
> static void xfrm_init_pmtu(struct dst_entry *dst);
>
> +static struct xfrm_policy *__xfrm_policy_unlink(struct xfrm_policy *pol,
> + int dir);
> +
> static inline int
> __xfrm4_selector_match(struct xfrm_selector *sel, struct flowi *fl)
> {
> @@ -602,12 +605,8 @@ int xfrm_policy_insert(int dir, struct xfrm_policy *policy, int excl)
> xfrm_pol_hold(policy);
> xfrm_policy_count[dir]++;
> atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid);
> - if (delpol) {
> - hlist_del(&delpol->bydst);
> - hlist_del(&delpol->byidx);
> - list_del(&delpol->walk.all);
> - xfrm_policy_count[dir]--;
> - }
> + if (delpol)
> + __xfrm_policy_unlink(delpol, dir);
> policy->index = delpol ? delpol->index : xfrm_gen_index(policy->type, dir);
> hlist_add_head(&policy->byidx, xfrm_policy_byidx+idx_hash(policy->index));
> policy->curlft.add_time = get_seconds();
> @@ -679,10 +678,7 @@ struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_bysel_ctx(u8 type, int dir,
> write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
> return pol;
> }
> - hlist_del(&pol->bydst);
> - hlist_del(&pol->byidx);
> - list_del(&pol->walk.all);
> - xfrm_policy_count[dir]--;
> + __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
> }
> ret = pol;
> break;
> @@ -723,10 +719,7 @@ struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_byid(u8 type, int dir, u32 id, int delete,
> write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
> return pol;
> }
> - hlist_del(&pol->bydst);
> - hlist_del(&pol->byidx);
> - list_del(&pol->walk.all);
> - xfrm_policy_count[dir]--;
> + __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
> }
> ret = pol;
> break;
> @@ -807,17 +800,14 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
> for (dir = 0; dir < XFRM_POLICY_MAX; dir++) {
> struct xfrm_policy *pol;
> struct hlist_node *entry;
> - int i, killed;
> + int i;
>
> - killed = 0;
> again1:
> hlist_for_each_entry(pol, entry,
> &xfrm_policy_inexact[dir], bydst) {
> if (pol->type != type)
> continue;
> - hlist_del(&pol->bydst);
> - hlist_del(&pol->byidx);
> - list_del(&pol->walk.all);
> + __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
> write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
>
> xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1, audit_info->loginuid,
> @@ -825,7 +815,6 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
> audit_info->secid);
>
> xfrm_policy_kill(pol);
> - killed++;
>
> write_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
> goto again1;
> @@ -838,9 +827,7 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
> bydst) {
> if (pol->type != type)
> continue;
> - hlist_del(&pol->bydst);
> - hlist_del(&pol->byidx);
> - list_del(&pol->walk.all);
> + __xfrm_policy_unlink(pol, dir);
> write_unlock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
>
> xfrm_audit_policy_delete(pol, 1,
> @@ -848,14 +835,11 @@ int xfrm_policy_flush(u8 type, struct xfrm_audit *audit_info)
> audit_info->sessionid,
> audit_info->secid);
> xfrm_policy_kill(pol);
> - killed++;
>
> write_lock_bh(&xfrm_policy_lock);
> goto again2;
> }
> }
> -
> - xfrm_policy_count[dir] -= killed;
> }
> atomic_inc(&flow_cache_genid);
> out:
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-01 9:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-01 2:00 [PATCH] xfrm: Fix kernel panic when flush and dump SPD entries Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 2:10 ` [PATCHv2] " Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 2:17 ` Yang Hongyang
2008-12-01 5:00 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-01 6:25 ` Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 6:27 ` [PATCHv3] " Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 7:50 ` [PATCH v4] " Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 8:11 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-01 8:38 ` David Miller
2008-12-01 9:50 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Wei Yongjun
2008-12-03 8:28 ` David Miller
2008-12-01 9:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfrm: Cleanup for unlink SPD entry Wei Yongjun
2008-12-01 9:57 ` Wei Yongjun [this message]
2008-12-02 6:53 ` Herbert Xu
2008-12-03 8:33 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4933B507.3020101@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).