From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Thery Subject: Re: [PATCH] igmp: allow IPPROTO_IGMP sockets in netns Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:48:44 +0100 Message-ID: <4948BCEC.3080301@bull.net> References: <20080908012919.GD575@x200.localdomain> <4947CD09.6060605@bull.net> <20081216.154442.128200358.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller , adobriyan@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from ecfrec.frec.bull.fr ([129.183.4.8]:44604 "EHLO ecfrec.frec.bull.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753853AbYLQIsw (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2008 03:48:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081216.154442.128200358.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > From: Benjamin Thery > Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:45:13 +0100 > >> I was wondering what happened to this patch to support igmp socket per-netns sent by Alexey in September? >> >> It looks like it has never been merged in net-next-2.6? >> >> There's also this other patch sent at the same time by Alexey to make igmp proc entries per-netns that was "lost": >> >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/105226 > > Please make a formal resubmission if I've missed something. > > That way there is no confusion about what patch I should > be adding. Sure. Alexey, will you resend these patches for IGMP? Or do you mind if I resend them for you? Benjamin > > Thanks. > > -- B e n j a m i n T h e r y - BULL/DT/Open Software R&D http://www.bull.com