From: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: James Chapman <jchapman@katalix.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppp: fix segfaults introduced by netdev_priv changes
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:15:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4949B240.7060102@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812172202.mBHM2GHi012456@bert.katalix.com>
James Chapman said the following on 2008-12-18 6:02:
> This patch fixes a segfault in ppp_shutdown_interface() and
> ppp_destroy_interface() when a PPP connection is closed. I bisected
> the problem to the following commit:
>
> commit c8019bf3aff653cceb64f66489fc299ee5957b57
> Author: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Date: Thu Nov 20 04:24:17 2008 -0800
>
> netdevice ppp: Convert directly reference of netdev->priv
>
> 1. Use netdev_priv(dev) to replace dev->priv.
> 2. Alloc netdev's private data by alloc_netdev().
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
>
Yes. My bad.
I should cc my previous patch to you ;)
> static void ppp_shutdown_interface(struct ppp *ppp)
> {
> - struct net_device *dev;
> -
> mutex_lock(&all_ppp_mutex);
> - ppp_lock(ppp);
> - dev = ppp->dev;
> - ppp->dev = NULL;
> - ppp_unlock(ppp);
> /* This will call dev_close() for us. */
> - if (dev) {
> - unregister_netdev(dev);
> - free_netdev(dev);
> - }
> + ppp_lock(ppp);
> + if (!ppp->closing) {
> + ppp->closing = 1;
> + ppp_unlock(ppp);
> + unregister_netdev(ppp->dev);
> + } else
> + ppp_unlock(ppp);
> +
> cardmap_set(&all_ppp_units, ppp->file.index, NULL);
> ppp->file.dead = 1;
> ppp->owner = NULL;
> @@ -2554,7 +2552,7 @@ static void ppp_destroy_interface(struct ppp *ppp)
> if (ppp->xmit_pending)
> kfree_skb(ppp->xmit_pending);
>
> - kfree(ppp);
> + free_netdev(ppp->dev);
> }
>
I have no comment on these changes, but
there is a path that calls only ppp_destroy_interface() no
ppp_shutdown_interface().
it's:
ppp_unregister_channel
--->ppp_disconnect_channel()
---> ppp_destroy_interface()
> /*
> @@ -2616,7 +2614,7 @@ ppp_connect_channel(struct channel *pch, int unit)
> if (pch->file.hdrlen > ppp->file.hdrlen)
> ppp->file.hdrlen = pch->file.hdrlen;
> hdrlen = pch->file.hdrlen + 2; /* for protocol bytes */
> - if (ppp->dev && hdrlen > ppp->dev->hard_header_len)
> + if (hdrlen > ppp->dev->hard_header_len)
> ppp->dev->hard_header_len = hdrlen;
> list_add_tail(&pch->clist, &ppp->channels);
> ++ppp->n_channels;
I don't understand this change.
Do you mean that in this place, ppp->dev will never be NULL?
B.R
Wang Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-18 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-17 22:02 [PATCH] ppp: fix segfaults introduced by netdev_priv changes James Chapman
2008-12-18 2:15 ` Wang Chen [this message]
2008-12-18 10:24 ` James Chapman
2008-12-18 3:20 ` David Miller
2008-12-18 10:28 ` James Chapman
2008-12-19 3:40 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4949B240.7060102@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jchapman@katalix.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).