From: Wei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>,
dccp@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: dccp test tree [RFC/RFT] [Patch 1/3] dccp: minor Kconfig cosmetics
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:06:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4962AE90.3030706@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090105144213.GB3773@gerrit.erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Gerrit Renker wrote:
> dccp ccid-3: Reformat Kconfig option for RTO timeout
>
> Apart from fixing indenting, it also updates the references
> (RFC 5348 has replaced RFC 3448).
>
> Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
> ---
> net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig
> +++ b/net/dccp/ccids/Kconfig
> @@ -48,35 +48,35 @@ config IP_DCCP_CCID3_DEBUG
> If in doubt, say N.
>
> config IP_DCCP_CCID3_RTO
> - int "Use higher bound for nofeedback timer"
> - default 100
> - depends on IP_DCCP_CCID3 && EXPERIMENTAL
> - ---help---
> - Use higher lower bound for nofeedback timer expiration.
> -
> - The TFRC nofeedback timer normally expires after the maximum of 4
> - RTTs and twice the current send interval (RFC 3448, 4.3). On LANs
> - with a small RTT this can mean a high processing load and reduced
> - performance, since then the nofeedback timer is triggered very
> - frequently.
> -
> - This option enables to set a higher lower bound for the nofeedback
> - value. Values in units of milliseconds can be set here.
> -
> - A value of 0 disables this feature by enforcing the value specified
> - in RFC 3448. The following values have been suggested as bounds for
> - experimental use:
> - * 16-20ms to match the typical multimedia inter-frame interval
> - * 100ms as a reasonable compromise [default]
> - * 1000ms corresponds to the lower TCP RTO bound (RFC 2988, 2.4)
> -
> - The default of 100ms is a compromise between a large value for
> - efficient DCCP implementations, and a small value to avoid disrupting
> - the network in times of congestion.
> -
> - The purpose of the nofeedback timer is to slow DCCP down when there
> - is serious network congestion: experimenting with larger values should
> - therefore not be performed on WANs.
> + int "Use higher bound for nofeedback timer"
> + default 100
> + depends on IP_DCCP_CCID3
> + ---help---
> + Use higher lower bound for nofeedback timer expiration.
> +
> + The TFRC nofeedback timer normally expires after the maximum of 4
> + RTTs and twice the current send interval (RFC 5448, 4.3). On LANs
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
RFC 5448 should be RFC 5348.
> + with a small RTT this can mean a high processing load and reduced
> + performance, since then the nofeedback timer is triggered very
> + frequently.
> +
> + This option enables to set a higher lower bound for the nofeedback
> + value. Values in units of milliseconds can be set here.
> +
> + A value of 0 disables this feature by enforcing the value specified
> + in RFC 5448. The following values have been suggested as bounds for
>
RFC 5448 should be RFC 5348.
> + experimental use:
> + * 16-20ms to match the typical multimedia inter-frame interval
> + * 100ms as a reasonable compromise [default]
> + * 1000ms corresponds to the lower TCP RTO bound (RFC 2988, 2.4)
> +
> + The default of 100ms is a compromise between a large value for
> + efficient DCCP implementations, and a small value to avoid disrupting
> + the network in times of congestion.
> +
> + The purpose of the nofeedback timer is to slow DCCP down when there
> + is serious network congestion: experimenting with larger values should
> + therefore not be performed on WANs.
>
> config IP_DCCP_TFRC_LIB
> def_bool y if IP_DCCP_CCID3
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-06 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-05 14:42 dccp test tree [RFC/RFT] [Patch 1/3] dccp: minor Kconfig cosmetics Gerrit Renker
2009-01-05 20:03 ` Ian McDonald
2009-01-06 1:06 ` Wei Yongjun [this message]
2009-01-06 1:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2009-01-06 12:22 ` Gerrit Renker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4962AE90.3030706@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=dccp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox