netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@hp.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2][RFC] virtio_net: MAC filtering
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:57:02 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4964FAFE.2040206@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1231352906.7109.140.camel@lappy>

Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-01-07 at 12:14 -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>   
>> Alex Williamson wrote:
>>     
>>> As noted in the RFC thread adding the kvm/qemu backing, this does
>>> increase the size of the virtio-net device I/O port space, up to 1kB
>>> with PCI rounding if we add a 4k entry VLAN bitmap.  A 64 device limit
>>> is still pretty high for a VM, but maybe we should think about adding
>>> MMIO space for virtio-pci.  Thanks,
>>>   
>>>       
>> I'm not quite sure the best way to address this.  Maybe another control 
>> queue for sending commands to control this sort of stuff?  What are your 
>> thoughts Rusty?
>>     
>
> This is also a good time to decide if a fixed 16 entry MAC filter table
> is sufficient.  Should the size be programmed into the config space?
> There's plenty of room to make it a bigger fixed size and still stay at
> 1kB of I/O port space with the VLAN table.  This implementation is a
> little wasteful of space in using 8 bytes to store the MAC and a valid
> bit, but I suspect there's some endian issues I'm ignoring and a
> standard data type might make that easier later.
>   

If we switch to a command queue, then there's no need to have any fixed 
limitation.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

> Alex
>
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-07 18:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-07 18:05 [PATCH 0/2][RFC] virtio_net: MAC filtering Alex Williamson
2009-01-07 18:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2009-01-07 18:28   ` Alex Williamson
2009-01-07 18:57     ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2009-01-09 17:54   ` Avi Kivity
2009-01-13 21:23 ` [PATCH 0/4] " Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4964FAFE.2040206@codemonkey.ws \
    --to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=alex.williamson@hp.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=markmc@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).