From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/6] Re: [PATCH 2/6] pkt_sched: sch_htb: Consider used jiffies in htb_dequeue() Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:56:37 +0100 Message-ID: <496AE9A5.9060507@trash.net> References: <20081210093532.GA7926@ff.dom.local> <20081216.155722.144236025.davem@davemloft.net> <20081217070303.GA4577@ff.dom.local> <20081216.233801.26557633.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jarkao2@gmail.com, devik@cdi.cz, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:57165 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751653AbZALG4j (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:56:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081216.233801.26557633.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > From: Jarek Poplawski > Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 07:03:03 +0000 > >> On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 03:57:22PM -0800, David Miller wrote: >>> Patrick, I know you said you were travelling and very busy, >>> but Jarek has been waiting patiently for you to review >>> these two newly respun patches. >>> >>> These are just rotting in my patch queue and I'd like to >>> do something with them. >> I guess Patrick has some doubts, but since these patches are not >> critical, let's say I'll resend them within a few weeks. > > Fair enough, I'll mark them deferred on patchwork Sorry, I dropped the ball on this one. I still think scheduling a work-queue or something else running in process context to kick the queue once the scheduler had a chance to run would be a better solution. But Jarek's patches are an improvement to the current situation, so no objections from me.