From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Subject: Re: [BUG #12364] Re: HTB - very bad precision? HFSC works fine!	2.6.28
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:27:10 +0100
Message-ID: <496AF0CE.7060406@trash.net>
References: <1935.87.196.72.187.1231371721.squirrel@webmail.decimal.pt> <200901082357.13396.denys@visp.net.lb> <20090109103030.GI4605@ff.dom.local> <200901091232.09923.denys@visp.net.lb> <20090109104411.GJ4605@ff.dom.local> <1504.192.168.1.3.1231498031.squirrel@webmail.decimal.pt> <20090109105858.GA6098@ff.dom.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jorge Bastos <mysql.jorge@decimal.pt>,
	Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@visp.net.lb>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:57668 "EHLO
	stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751521AbZALH1N (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 02:27:13 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20090109105858.GA6098@ff.dom.local>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 10:47:11AM -0000, Jorge Bastos wrote:
>> For my case this has any matter?
>>
> 
> I guess not: it's about better resolution, so e.g. when 2% matters.
> And it matters for a desktop box, if you care about responsiveness.

Just wondering since this thread is very hard to follow with all
the top postings, incorrect timestamps on mails etc. - has there
been a resolution to this problem?