From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: add optimized generic percpu accessors Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:07:14 +0900 Message-ID: <497F93A2.404@kernel.org> References: <20090115183942.GA6325@elte.hu> <200901201328.24605.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <49756E6E.2060409@kernel.org> <200901271213.18605.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <497E705B.5000302@kernel.org> <20090127131317.GF23121@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Rusty Russell , Herbert Xu , akpm@linux-foundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, brgerst@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, cl@linux-foundation.org, travis@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, steiner@sgi.com, hugh@veritas.com, "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Mathieu Desnoyers To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: Received: from hera.kernel.org ([140.211.167.34]:39671 "EHLO hera.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751346AbZA0XHn (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:07:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090127131317.GF23121@elte.hu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Tejun Heo wrote: > >>> Tejun, any chance of you updating the tj-percpu tree? My current >>> patches are against Linus's tree, and rebasing them on yours involves >>> some icky merging. >> If Ingo is okay with it, I'm fine with it too. Unless Ingo objects, >> I'll do it tomorrow-ish (still big holiday here). > > Sure - but please do it as a clean rebase ontop of latest, not as a > conflict-merge, as i'd expect there to be quite many clashes. Alrighty, re-basing. Thanks. -- tejun