netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
To: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Guido Guenther <agx@sigxcpu.org>
Subject: Re: Allow group ownership of TUN/TAP devices.
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2009 17:44:34 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <498706D2.5070003@msgid.tls.msk.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498700CD.2030403@msgid.tls.msk.ru>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 885 bytes --]

Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
> 2, and this is the main one: How about supplementary groups?
> 
> Here I have a valid usage case: a group of testers running various
> versions of windows using KVM (kernel virtual machine), 1 at a time,
> to test some software.  kvm is set up to use bridge with a tap device
> (there should be a way to connect to the machine).  Anyone on that group
> has to be able to start/stop the virtual machines.
> 
> My first attempt - pretty obvious when I saw -g option of tunctl - is
> to add group ownership for the tun device and add a supplementary group
> to each user (their primary group should be different).  But that fails,
> since kernel only checks for egid, not any other group ids.
> 
> What's the reasoning to not allow supplementary groups and to only check
> for egid?

Like this.

Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>

Thanks!

/mjt


[-- Attachment #2: tun-allow-supplementary-groups.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 444 bytes --]

--- linux-2.6.28/drivers/net/tun.c.orig	2008-12-25 02:26:37.000000000 +0300
+++ linux-2.6.28/drivers/net/tun.c	2009-02-02 17:33:02.000000000 +0300
@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ static int tun_set_iff(struct net *net, 
 		if (((tun->owner != -1 &&
 		      current->euid != tun->owner) ||
 		     (tun->group != -1 &&
-		      current->egid != tun->group)) &&
+		      !in_egroup_p(tun->group))) &&
 		     !capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
 			return -EPERM;
 	}

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-02 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-02 14:18 Allow group ownership of TUN/TAP devices Michael Tokarev
2009-02-02 14:44 ` Michael Tokarev [this message]
2009-02-03  7:35   ` David Miller
2009-02-05 10:54 ` Guido Günther
2009-03-24 18:10   ` Michael Tokarev

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=498706D2.5070003@msgid.tls.msk.ru \
    --to=mjt@tls.msk.ru \
    --cc=agx@sigxcpu.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).