netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
To: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] iproute2 : invalid burst/cburst calculation with hrtimers
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 22:53:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <498A0E4A.8050807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <498A0699.6020103@gmail.com>

Jarek Poplawski wrote, On 02/04/2009 10:20 PM:

> Denys Fedoryschenko wrote, On 02/02/2009 07:21 PM:
> 
>> Why floating point?
> 
> 
> Yes, floating point is not enough. get_hz() == 1000000000 could be
> a theoretical resolution, but I guess we don't expect to use this,
> even if it were possible. Since high resolution can schedule more
> often than 1000HZ, it seems these buffers could be set lower (10x,
> 100x?), but there should be some reasonable limit.


Anyway, it's rather a matter of tweaking. IMHO 1000HZ limit for setting
these defaults looks safe, so I think this patch is OK.

Jarek P.
 
>> It seems get_hz (and burst in result) just cannot be too low.
>> Still seems some code in HTB rely on jiffies, so get_hz() probably just wrong.
>>
>> Already i'm tried to increase burst/cburst calculation precision, but it will 
>> fail still with such high get_hz variable.
>>
>> Ii dont know way to get real HZ variable from userspace.
>>
>> Here is Martin Devera answer
>>> but it really
>>> seems as if get_hz() is too high.
>>> For 1000Mbps - it is 1MB per 1 ms and assuming HZ=1000, then burst
>>> should be about 1MB.
>>> But I must admit, I'm not familiar with latest state of HZ in kernel.
>>> There was "NO_NZ" effort IIRC, where the HZ granularity can be
>>> considerably finer - but still not infinite.
>>
>>
>> On Monday 02 February 2009 20:07:42 Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 19:26:17 +0200
>>>
>>> Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@visp.net.lb> wrote:
>>>> ------------->
>>>> iproute2 : invalid burst/cburst calculation with hrtimers
>>>>
>>>> If hrtimers on, /proc/net/psched shows 4th variable
>>>> as 1000000000
>>>> Because burst calculated by division rate to this variable,
>>>> it will be almost always zero. As result, we will get higher system
>>>> load on low rates, and on high rates shaper will not able to process
>>>> data. So it is kind of critical bugfix for systems with hrtimers.
>>>> It is checked and proved. Core 2 Quad was not able to
>>>> shape 200Mbps, and gave only 180-190. It is more safe to set it
>>>> to 1000HZ. If user wants, he can set custom "env" HZ variable.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Denys Fedoryschenko <denys@visp.net.lb>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> -------------------------------------------------------
>>> I would rather this be converted to floating point.
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-04 21:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-02 17:26 [PATCH] [RESEND] iproute2 : invalid burst/cburst calculation with hrtimers Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-02-02 18:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2009-02-02 18:21   ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-02-04 21:20     ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-02-04 21:53       ` Jarek Poplawski [this message]
2009-02-04 22:26         ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-02-04 22:49           ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-02-04 23:24             ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-02-05  7:38               ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-02-05  9:01                 ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-02-05 10:08                   ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-02-05 11:09                     ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-02-05 11:56                       ` Jarek Poplawski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=498A0E4A.8050807@gmail.com \
    --to=jarkao2@gmail.com \
    --cc=denys@visp.net.lb \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).