From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regression on VIA C3 motherboard, commit: 66f2173e2
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:20:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <498C8D68.3040504@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0902061350470.26256@localhost.localdomain>
Len Brown wrote:
> Thanks for the bisect, Ben.
>
> Please test the patch below.
>
> I assume even without the patch, booting with "acpi=off" on your
> BIOS-ACPI-disabled box works? (if no, this patch will not solve
> all your problems, for you have additional trouble elsewhere)
>
> I am curious why you're running a CONFIG_ACPI=y kernel
> for a box with ACPI disabled. (though yes, it is supposed to work)
>
> I'm even more curious what bad things happen when
> you enable ACPI in the BIOS -- can you let me know
> and we can try to fix them so the machine can run as shipped?
At one time, these boxes would actually burn out their power
supply if you did an 'init 0' with the BIOS configured to
shut down the system. It would just suck more and more power
(we measured) until the brick smoked, and the motherboard components
got very hot as well. I think we were just lucky that the PS died
before the MB did.
This was a while back, but I believe part of the fix was to disable
ACPI so the system couldn't possibly try to power itself down
in this manner.
I will try your patch, but I'm about to go off for a ~2week vacation,
so I probably won't have time to test enabling ACPI and/or compiling
a kernel w/out it to see what shakes out.
I re-worked my previous patch per Ingo's suggestion and am
about to send it off..but please feel free to NAK it if you
think it's wrong. I don't really know enough about this area
to argue one way or another.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-06 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-05 7:23 Regression on VIA C3 motherboard, commit: 66f2173e2 Ben Greear
2009-02-06 0:33 ` Robert Hancock
2009-02-06 6:10 ` Ben Greear
2009-02-06 14:46 ` Robert Hancock
2009-02-06 18:57 ` Len Brown
2009-02-06 19:20 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2009-02-06 19:52 ` Ben Greear
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=498C8D68.3040504@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).