* [PATCH] netlink: add NETLINK_BROADCAST_REPORT_ERROR socket option
@ 2009-02-16 10:52 Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-02-16 11:13 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2009-02-16 10:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: kaber, davem
This patch adds NETLINK_BROADCAST_REPORT_ERROR which is a netlink
socket option that the listener can set to make netlink_broadcast()
return errors in the delivery to the caller. This option is useful
if the caller of netlink_broadcast() do something with the result
of the message delivery, like in ctnetlink where it drops a network
packet if the event delivery failed, this is used to enable reliable
logging and state-synchronization. If this socket option is not set,
netlink_broadcast() only reports ESRCH errors and silently ignore
ENOBUFS errors, which is what most netlink_broadcast() callers
should do.
This socket option is based on a suggestion from Patrick McHardy.
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
---
include/linux/netlink.h | 1 +
net/netlink/af_netlink.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netlink.h b/include/linux/netlink.h
index 51b09a1..8978ae9 100644
--- a/include/linux/netlink.h
+++ b/include/linux/netlink.h
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ struct nlmsgerr
#define NETLINK_ADD_MEMBERSHIP 1
#define NETLINK_DROP_MEMBERSHIP 2
#define NETLINK_PKTINFO 3
+#define NETLINK_BROADCAST_REPORT_ERROR 4
struct nl_pktinfo
{
diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
index 6ee69c2..29dd4fb 100644
--- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
+++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
@@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct netlink_sock {
#define NETLINK_KERNEL_SOCKET 0x1
#define NETLINK_RECV_PKTINFO 0x2
+#define NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR 0x4
static inline struct netlink_sock *nlk_sk(struct sock *sk)
{
@@ -994,13 +995,15 @@ static inline int do_one_broadcast(struct sock *sk,
if (p->skb2 == NULL) {
netlink_overrun(sk);
/* Clone failed. Notify ALL listeners. */
- p->failure = 1;
+ if (nlk->flags & NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR)
+ p->failure = 1;
} else if (sk_filter(sk, p->skb2)) {
kfree_skb(p->skb2);
p->skb2 = NULL;
} else if ((val = netlink_broadcast_deliver(sk, p->skb2)) < 0) {
netlink_overrun(sk);
- p->delivery_failure = 1;
+ if (nlk->flags & NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR)
+ p->delivery_failure = 1;
} else {
p->congested |= val;
p->delivered = 1;
@@ -1163,6 +1166,13 @@ static int netlink_setsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
err = 0;
break;
}
+ case NETLINK_BROADCAST_REPORT_ERROR:
+ if (val)
+ nlk->flags |= NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR;
+ else
+ nlk->flags &= ~NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR;
+ err = 0;
+ break;
default:
err = -ENOPROTOOPT;
}
@@ -1195,6 +1205,16 @@ static int netlink_getsockopt(struct socket *sock, int level, int optname,
return -EFAULT;
err = 0;
break;
+ case NETLINK_BROADCAST_REPORT_ERROR:
+ if (len < sizeof(int))
+ return -EINVAL;
+ len = sizeof(int);
+ val = nlk->flags & NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR ? 1 : 0;
+ if (put_user(len, optlen) ||
+ put_user(val, optval))
+ return -EFAULT;
+ err = 0;
+ break;
default:
err = -ENOPROTOOPT;
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netlink: add NETLINK_BROADCAST_REPORT_ERROR socket option
2009-02-16 10:52 [PATCH] netlink: add NETLINK_BROADCAST_REPORT_ERROR socket option Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2009-02-16 11:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-16 14:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2009-02-16 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso; +Cc: netdev, davem
Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> index 6ee69c2..29dd4fb 100644
> --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct netlink_sock {
>
> #define NETLINK_KERNEL_SOCKET 0x1
> #define NETLINK_RECV_PKTINFO 0x2
> +#define NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR 0x4
The name seems to imply send twice (send/report).
> static inline struct netlink_sock *nlk_sk(struct sock *sk)
> {
> @@ -994,13 +995,15 @@ static inline int do_one_broadcast(struct sock *sk,
> if (p->skb2 == NULL) {
> netlink_overrun(sk);
> /* Clone failed. Notify ALL listeners. */
> - p->failure = 1;
> + if (nlk->flags & NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR)
> + p->failure = 1;
This doesn't make sense. *Other* sockets get skipped only iff
this socket had the error-report flag set? This should be done
in a consistent manner, which means either not set the failure
flag at all and retry for all sockets, or set it for any failed
socket delivery and determine the return value based on whether
one of the skipped sockets had the error-report flag set.
> } else if (sk_filter(sk, p->skb2)) {
> kfree_skb(p->skb2);
> p->skb2 = NULL;
> } else if ((val = netlink_broadcast_deliver(sk, p->skb2)) < 0) {
> netlink_overrun(sk);
> - p->delivery_failure = 1;
> + if (nlk->flags & NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR)
> + p->delivery_failure = 1;
> } else {
> p->congested |= val;
> p->delivered = 1;
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netlink: add NETLINK_BROADCAST_REPORT_ERROR socket option
2009-02-16 14:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
@ 2009-02-16 14:06 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Patrick McHardy @ 2009-02-16 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso; +Cc: netdev, davem
Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Patrick McHardy wrote:
>>> static inline struct netlink_sock *nlk_sk(struct sock *sk)
>>> {
>>> @@ -994,13 +995,15 @@ static inline int do_one_broadcast(struct sock
>>> *sk,
>>> if (p->skb2 == NULL) {
>>> netlink_overrun(sk);
>>> /* Clone failed. Notify ALL listeners. */
>>> - p->failure = 1;
>>> + if (nlk->flags & NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR)
>>> + p->failure = 1;
>>
>> This doesn't make sense. *Other* sockets get skipped only iff
>> this socket had the error-report flag set? This should be done
>> in a consistent manner, which means either not set the failure
>> flag at all and retry for all sockets, or set it for any failed
>> socket delivery and determine the return value based on whether
>> one of the skipped sockets had the error-report flag set.
>
> I can add a check for the flag to allow sockets without the flag set to
> try to send the message:
>
> if ((nlk->flags & NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_ERROR) && p->failure) {
> netlink_overrun(sk);
> goto out;
> }
>
> Still, this "skip" behaviour looks to me strange. I don't see why a
> socket should skip if other socket's clone failed. Wouldn't it be better
> to remove this?
Yes, that was the first of my suggestions. I don't care much which
way its done, but it should provide a consistent behaviour, which
means skipping should not depend on the setting of a *different*
socket.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] netlink: add NETLINK_BROADCAST_REPORT_ERROR socket option
2009-02-16 11:13 ` Patrick McHardy
@ 2009-02-16 14:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-02-16 14:06 ` Patrick McHardy
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso @ 2009-02-16 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Patrick McHardy; +Cc: netdev, davem
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
>> diff --git a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
>> index 6ee69c2..29dd4fb 100644
>> --- a/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
>> +++ b/net/netlink/af_netlink.c
>> @@ -85,6 +85,7 @@ struct netlink_sock {
>>
>> #define NETLINK_KERNEL_SOCKET 0x1
>> #define NETLINK_RECV_PKTINFO 0x2
>> +#define NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR 0x4
>
> The name seems to imply send twice (send/report).
Indeed. I didn't like this initial name a lot.
>> static inline struct netlink_sock *nlk_sk(struct sock *sk)
>> {
>> @@ -994,13 +995,15 @@ static inline int do_one_broadcast(struct sock *sk,
>> if (p->skb2 == NULL) {
>> netlink_overrun(sk);
>> /* Clone failed. Notify ALL listeners. */
>> - p->failure = 1;
>> + if (nlk->flags & NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_REPORT_ERROR)
>> + p->failure = 1;
>
> This doesn't make sense. *Other* sockets get skipped only iff
> this socket had the error-report flag set? This should be done
> in a consistent manner, which means either not set the failure
> flag at all and retry for all sockets, or set it for any failed
> socket delivery and determine the return value based on whether
> one of the skipped sockets had the error-report flag set.
I can add a check for the flag to allow sockets without the flag set to
try to send the message:
if ((nlk->flags & NETLINK_BROADCAST_SEND_ERROR) && p->failure) {
netlink_overrun(sk);
goto out;
}
Still, this "skip" behaviour looks to me strange. I don't see why a
socket should skip if other socket's clone failed. Wouldn't it be better
to remove this?
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-02-16 14:06 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-02-16 10:52 [PATCH] netlink: add NETLINK_BROADCAST_REPORT_ERROR socket option Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-02-16 11:13 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-16 14:10 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-02-16 14:06 ` Patrick McHardy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).