From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] pcmcia: worklimit reaches -1
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:26:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A538EB.8080008@gmail.com> (raw)
------------------------------>8-------------8<---------------------------------
with while (--worklimit >= 0); worklimit reaches -1 after the loop. In
3c589_cs.c this caused a warning not to be printed.
In 3c574_cs.c contrastingly, el3_rx() treats worklimit differently:
static int el3_rx(struct net_device *dev, int worklimit)
{
while (--worklimit >= 0) { ... }
return worklimit;
}
el3_rx() is only called by function el3_interrupt(): twice:
static irqreturn_t el3_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
int work_budget = max_interrupt_work;
while(...) {
if (...)
work_budget = el3_rx(dev, work_budget);
if (...)
work_budget = el3_rx(dev, work_budget);
if (--work_budget < 0) {
...
break;
}
}
}
The error path can occur 2 too early.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
---
el3_rx() calls: lines 839 and 856
el3_interrupt(): line 810
diff --git a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
index e5cb6b1..2404a83 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c574_cs.c
@@ -1035,7 +1035,8 @@ static int el3_rx(struct net_device *dev, int worklimit)
DEBUG(3, "%s: in rx_packet(), status %4.4x, rx_status %4.4x.\n",
dev->name, inw(ioaddr+EL3_STATUS), inw(ioaddr+RxStatus));
while (!((rx_status = inw(ioaddr + RxStatus)) & 0x8000) &&
- (--worklimit >= 0)) {
+ worklimit > 0) {
+ worklimit--;
if (rx_status & 0x4000) { /* Error, update stats. */
short error = rx_status & 0x3800;
dev->stats.rx_errors++;
diff --git a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c589_cs.c b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c589_cs.c
index 73ecc65..1e01b8a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c589_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/pcmcia/3c589_cs.c
@@ -857,7 +857,8 @@ static int el3_rx(struct net_device *dev)
DEBUG(3, "%s: in rx_packet(), status %4.4x, rx_status %4.4x.\n",
dev->name, inw(ioaddr+EL3_STATUS), inw(ioaddr+RX_STATUS));
while (!((rx_status = inw(ioaddr + RX_STATUS)) & 0x8000) &&
- (--worklimit >= 0)) {
+ worklimit > 0) {
+ worklimit--;
if (rx_status & 0x4000) { /* Error, update stats. */
short error = rx_status & 0x3800;
dev->stats.rx_errors++;
next reply other threads:[~2009-02-25 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-25 12:26 Roel Kluin [this message]
2009-03-04 8:06 ` [PATCH] pcmcia: worklimit reaches -1 David Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-02-26 21:37 Komuro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49A538EB.8080008@gmail.com \
--to=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).