From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: unloading the ipv6 module Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:01:41 +0100 Message-ID: <49A6A0C5.60105@free.fr> References: <49A69784.6070204@free.fr> <20090226.052411.77955912.davem@davemloft.net> <49A69C66.6000005@free.fr> <20090226.055138.178968734.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mtagate8.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.141]:49307 "EHLO mtagate8.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753211AbZBZOBx (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Feb 2009 09:01:53 -0500 Received: from d06nrmr1806.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1806.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.39.193]) by mtagate8.uk.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1QE1plb379618 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:01:51 GMT Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.213]) by d06nrmr1806.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v9.2) with ESMTP id n1QE1oXO3125448 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:01:50 GMT Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n1QE1o5X004543 for ; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:01:50 GMT In-Reply-To: <20090226.055138.178968734.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > From: Daniel Lezcano > Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:43:02 +0100 > > >> I was wondering if it would have make sense to remove the unloading >> module code from ipv6 which is big at all and not testable. >> > > The majority of that code is needed anyways for the module load > failure paths. Right, I missed this point. I have my answer :) Thanks -- Daniel