From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: more timeouts that reach -1
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:16:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A803C2.4070702@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A5286D.80304@gmail.com>
Roel Kluin wrote:
> These were not previously reported by me.
> ------------------------------>8-------------8<---------------------------------
> with while (timeout-- > 0); timeout reaches -1 after the loop, so the tests
> below are off by one.
I just noticed that in drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c after my patch this still
won't give an err, because timeout is unsigned
------------------------------>8-------------8<---------------------------------
with while (timeout-- > 0); timeout reaches -1 after the loop, so the tests
below are off by one. also don't do an '< 0' test on an unsigned.
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c b/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
index 1cf2f94..f3a1274 100644
--- a/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/arm/ks8695net.c
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ ks8695_reset(struct ks8695_priv *ksp)
msleep(1);
}
- if (reset_timeout == 0) {
+ if (reset_timeout < 0) {
dev_crit(ksp->dev,
"Timeout waiting for DMA engines to reset\n");
/* And blithely carry on */
diff --git a/drivers/net/jme.c b/drivers/net/jme.c
index 08b3405..0173ed0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/jme.c
+++ b/drivers/net/jme.c
@@ -957,7 +957,8 @@ jme_process_receive(struct jme_adapter *jme, int limit)
goto out_inc;
i = atomic_read(&rxring->next_to_clean);
- while (limit-- > 0) {
+ while (limit > 0) {
+ limit--;
rxdesc = rxring->desc;
rxdesc += i;
diff --git a/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c b/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c
index 5463591..0ada4ed 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ucc_geth_mii.c
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ int uec_mdio_read(struct mii_bus *bus, int mii_id, int regnum)
static int uec_mdio_reset(struct mii_bus *bus)
{
struct ucc_mii_mng __iomem *regs = (void __iomem *)bus->priv;
- unsigned int timeout = PHY_INIT_TIMEOUT;
+ int timeout = PHY_INIT_TIMEOUT;
mutex_lock(&bus->mdio_lock);
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ static int uec_mdio_reset(struct mii_bus *bus)
mutex_unlock(&bus->mdio_lock);
- if (timeout <= 0) {
+ if (timeout < 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: The MII Bus is stuck!\n", bus->name);
return -EBUSY;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-25 11:15 [PATCH] net: more timeouts that reach -1 Roel Kluin
2009-02-27 11:43 ` Guo-Fu Tseng
2009-02-27 15:37 ` roel kluin
2009-02-27 15:51 ` Guo-Fu Tseng
2009-02-27 16:43 ` [PATCH v3] " Roel Kluin
2009-03-04 8:10 ` David Miller
2009-02-27 15:16 ` Roel Kluin [this message]
2009-03-04 8:05 ` [PATCH] " David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49A803C2.4070702@gmail.com \
--to=roel.kluin@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).