netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Thomas <gary@mlbassoc.com>
To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Marvell 88E609x switch?
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:25:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A80606.1040508@mlbassoc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090227151441.GE17040@xi.wantstofly.org>

Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 08:08:22AM -0700, Gary Thomas wrote:
> 
>>>> OK, I did that:
>>>>   Sending discover...
>>>>   PHY: 0:01 - Link is Up - 1000/Full
>>>>
>>>> I now see the fixed PHY (pretender, configured at build time)
>>>> and the 8 LAN sockets:
>>>>   root@ppc_target:~ ls /sys/bus/mdio_bus/devices/
>>>>   0:01         24520:01:01  24520:01:03  24520:01:05  24520:01:07
>>>>   24520:01:00  24520:01:02  24520:01:04  24520:01:06
>>>>
>>>> But nothing seems to get through the switch.  Of course, I
>>>> know that the switch and connections are working because that's
>>>> the path I downloaded/booted the kernel from.
>>>>
>>>> Getting closer :-) Any ideas?
>>> :-)  Do you see messages in your syslog about the lan interfaces
>>> being up, full duplex, etc?  Something a la (from one of my boards):
>>>
>>> 	lan1: link up, 1000 Mb/s, full duplex, flow control disabled
>>> 	lan2: link up, 1000 Mb/s, full duplex, flow control disabled
>> This does seem to work:
>>   root@ppc_target:~ ifconfig lan1.1 up
>>   root@ppc_target:~ lan1.1: link up, 100 Mb/s, full duplex, flow control disabled
>>
>> When I try it on other ports:
>>   root@ppc_target:~ ifconfig lan1.2 up
>>   root@ppc_target:~ ifconfig lan1.3 up
>> Those ports aren't plugged (and I'm 6000 miles from them, literally,
>> so I can't change that)
> 
> OK, that makes sense then.
> 
> 
>>> If yes, can you up the interfaces, and send some packets over them
>>> and see if the TX counters on eth0 increase?  If yes, can you dump
>>> the packets sent out over eth0 using tcpdump?
>> I tried to ping out and into the box.  Nothing seems to go anywhere:
>>
>> root@ppc_target:~ ifconfig
>> eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1D:11:81:00:00
>>           inet addr:192.168.12.189  Bcast:192.168.12.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
>>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>           TX packets:17 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
>>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:1810 (1.7 KiB)
>>           Base address:0x6000
>>
>> lan1.1    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1D:11:81:00:00
>>           UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
>>           RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
>>           TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
>>           collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
>>           RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:0 (0.0 B)
>>
>> Running tcpdump on the external network (192.168.12.x), I saw
>> no activity.
>>
>> Do I need to do anything more than "ifconfig lan1.1 up"?
> 
> IP addresses should be attached to the lanX.X interfaces, not to eth0
> -- eth0 will only be carrying specially tagged (DSA/EDSA) packets.
> So you should move the IP address to lan1.1.
> 
> Can you trying pinging via lan1.1 and then seeing if there are
> packets transmitted out over eth0, and dump those packets with tcpdump?
> 

It looks like the packets are going out, but I don't see anything
on the wire.  After a few ping attempts:

root@ppc_target:~ ifconfig
eth0      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1D:11:81:00:00
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:41 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:2974 (2.9 KiB)
          Base address:0x6000

lan1.1    Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1D:11:81:00:00
          inet addr:192.168.12.189  Bcast:192.168.12.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:39 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0
          RX bytes:0 (0.0 B)  TX bytes:1638 (1.5 KiB)

The eth0 and lan1.1 counters are going up at more or less the
same rate.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------
Gary Thomas                 |  Consulting for the
MLB Associates              |    Embedded world
------------------------------------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-27 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-25  1:16 Marvell 88E609x switch? Gary Thomas
2009-02-25  6:31 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-02-25 13:15 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-25 21:30   ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-26 15:11     ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-26 15:47       ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-26 15:57         ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27  1:12           ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27  1:19             ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 12:25               ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 12:42                 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 12:53                   ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 13:19                     ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 13:23                       ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 13:27                         ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 14:27                           ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 14:36                             ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 14:40                               ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 14:55                                 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 14:57                                   ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 15:08                                     ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 15:14                                       ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 15:25                                         ` Gary Thomas [this message]
2009-02-27 15:27                                           ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 15:29                                             ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 15:31                                               ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 15:44                                                 ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 15:52                                                   ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 21:12                                                     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-02-27 22:28                                                       ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-03-02 10:56                                                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-02 11:05                                                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-02 15:14                                                             ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-02 15:22                                                               ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-02 22:05                                                                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-02 22:32                                                                   ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-03  8:52                                                                     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-03  9:04                                                                       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-03 12:02                                                                         ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-03 12:03                                                                       ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-03 12:32                                                                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-03 13:25                                                                           ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-03 13:30                                                                             ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-03 21:52                                                                               ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-06 15:49                                                                                 ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-07 15:53                                                                                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
     [not found]                                                                                   ` <20090310102805.GO4738@xi.wantstofly.org>
2009-03-10 11:20                                                                                     ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-10 13:36                                                                                       ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-03-10 15:11                                                                                         ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-11 15:12                                                                                           ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-03-11 21:28                                                                                           ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-03-10  9:56                                                                   ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-03-10  9:43                                                                 ` Lennert Buytenhek
     [not found]                                                           ` <20090310093915.GK4738@xi.wantstofly.org>
2009-03-10 11:20                                                             ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-28 17:37                                                       ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-28 19:10                                                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-02-28 19:31                                                           ` Gary Thomas
2009-03-02 10:14                                                           ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-03-10  9:34                                                             ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 12:52                 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 13:22                   ` Gary Thomas
2009-02-27 14:25                     ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-02-27 15:18                       ` Anton Vorontsov
2009-02-27 15:26                         ` Gary Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49A80606.1040508@mlbassoc.com \
    --to=gary@mlbassoc.com \
    --cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).