From: Santwona.Behera@Sun.COM
To: Srivats P <Srivats.P@conexant.com>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question about IP-in-IP tunneling
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:14:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49A81F68.8040906@Sun.COM> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F33E0C3C2876A544ABD34CFBE345A4A4027BC08A94@NDMBX01.bbnet.ad>
That does answer my question, thank you. Extending this to IPv6 as the
outer header, is the next header field IPROTO_IPIP for IPv4 inner header
and IPPROTO_IPV6 for IPv6 inner header?
thanks!
--santwona
On 02/26/09 08:15 PM, Srivats P wrote:
> Assuming the outer IP header is a IPv4 header, the protocol field of this IPv4 header has IPROTO_IPIP (4) when the inner header is IPv4 and IPPROTO_IPV6 (41) when the inner header is IPv6
>
> Is that what you asked?
>
> - Srivats
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Santwona.Behera@Sun.COM
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2009 2:37 AM
> To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Question about IP-in-IP tunneling
>
> A question for the IP tunneling experts:
>
> For IP-in-IP tunneling, what are the cases when IPROTO_IPIP (4) is used in the protocol field of the outer IP header and the cases when
> IPPROTO_IPV6 (41) is used instead?
>
> thanks,
> --santwona
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
> Conexant E-mail Firewall (Conexant.Com) made the following annotations
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> ********************** Legal Disclaimer ****************************
>
> "This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any unauthorized review, use or distribution by others is strictly prohibited. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply email and delete the message. Thank you."
>
> **********************************************************************
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-26 21:07 Question about IP-in-IP tunneling Santwona.Behera
2009-02-27 4:15 ` Srivats P
2009-02-27 17:14 ` Santwona.Behera [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49A81F68.8040906@Sun.COM \
--to=santwona.behera@sun.com \
--cc=Srivats.P@conexant.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).