netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>,
	aowi@novozymes.com
Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice
Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:53:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49B581D3.6060807@krogh.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9712.1236279072@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>

Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> 	However, I did find another bug I introduced during the "mii
> refactor" patch that you mentioned as being the original source of the
> problem.  That bug will cause 802.3ad to not notice speed changes.
> 
> 	Could you test the patch below on your 2.6.68.7 and/or 2.6.27.19
> and see if it resolves your problem (without the forcedeth patch)?

There was something missing from the header to make it compile.. I found 
that in a later version. Patch below fixed the problem (without the 
forcedeth patch).

diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c 
b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
index 1b9c4dc..fd61dfb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c
@@ -3516,11 +3516,27 @@ static int bond_slave_netdev_event(unsigned long 
event, struct net_device *slave
                 }
                 break;
         case NETDEV_CHANGE:
-               /*
-                * TODO: is this what we get if somebody
-                * sets up a hierarchical bond, then rmmod's
-                * one of the slave bonding devices?
-                */
+               if (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_8023AD ||
+                   bond_is_lb(bond)) {
+                       struct slave *slave;
+
+                       slave = bond_get_slave_by_dev(bond, slave_dev);
+                       if (slave) {
+                               u16 old_speed = slave->speed;
+                               u16 old_duplex = slave->duplex;
+
+                               bond_update_speed_duplex(slave);
+
+                               if (bond_is_lb(bond))
+                                       break;
+
+                               if (old_speed != slave->speed)
+ 
bond_3ad_adapter_speed_changed(slave);
+                               if (old_duplex != slave->duplex)
+ 
bond_3ad_adapter_duplex_changed(slave);
+                       }
+               }
+
                 break;
         case NETDEV_DOWN:
                 /*
diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
index fb730ec..b1315e4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
+++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bonding.h
@@ -248,6 +248,14 @@ static inline struct bonding 
*bond_get_bond_by_slave(struct slave *slave)
         return (struct bonding *)slave->dev->master->priv;
  }

+static inline bool bond_is_lb(const struct bonding *bond)
+{
+        return bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_TLB
+                || bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_ALB;
+}
+
+
+
  #define BOND_FOM_NONE                  0
  #define BOND_FOM_ACTIVE                        1
  #define BOND_FOM_FOLLOW                        2


  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-09 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-16  9:41 Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 Jesper Krogh
2008-11-17 23:45 ` Jay Vosburgh
2008-11-18 20:24   ` Jesper Krogh
2008-11-18 20:28     ` Jesper Krogh
2008-11-18 20:53     ` Jay Vosburgh
2008-11-19  7:53       ` Jesper Krogh
2008-12-08 20:42     ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2008-11-19 10:01   ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27  9:25 ` Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 16:28   ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-27 20:07     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-02-27 20:35       ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-02-28 17:21         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01  6:21         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-01 13:19           ` Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice Jesper Krogh
2009-03-05 18:51             ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-03-09 20:53               ` Jesper Krogh [this message]
2009-03-13 23:12                 ` David Miller
2009-03-13 23:27                   ` Jay Vosburgh
2009-03-16 20:34                     ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-16 20:35                       ` David Miller
2009-03-17 20:18                         ` Jesper Krogh
2009-03-19  1:39                     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49B581D3.6060807@krogh.cc \
    --to=jesper@krogh.cc \
    --cc=aowi@novozymes.com \
    --cc=fubar@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).