netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@dev.6wind.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFRM state hash value
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:08:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49B67450.1060002@dev.6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090310.042051.107256879.davem@davemloft.net>

This patch is ok with my test case.
I'm asking me if we should perform the step with saddr_wildcard if we have 
already found one. The state with a src address may have an higher priority than 
the state with a wildcare address, no?

Nicolas

Le 10.03.2009 12:20, David Miller a écrit :
> From: Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@dev.6wind.com>
> Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:46:03 +0100
> 
>> this commit: [XFRM]: Hash xfrm_state objects by source address too. (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=c1969f294e624d5b642fc8e6ab9468b7c7791fa8)
>> introduces src address in hash for state.
>> But in some cases, source address is a wildcard when state is inserted. For example, we can have something like this:
>> # setkey -c
>> add :: ff02::9 ah 0x100 -m transport -A hmac-md5 "cle3goldorakcle3";
>>
>> In this case, __xfrm_state_insert() will calculate the hash value with src address set to 0, but xfrm_state_find() will use the real source address to calculate this hash. At the end, no state will be found.
>> The most simple way to resolve this pb is to revert the previous patch, but maybe someone has a better idea...
>>
> 
> Please try this patch:
> 
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> index e25ff62..86b9078 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c
> @@ -748,12 +748,51 @@ static void xfrm_hash_grow_check(struct net *net, int have_hash_collision)
>  		schedule_work(&net->xfrm.state_hash_work);
>  }
>  
> +static void xfrm_state_look_at(struct xfrm_policy *pol, struct xfrm_state *x,
> +			       struct flowi *fl, unsigned short family,
> +			       xfrm_address_t *daddr, xfrm_address_t *saddr,
> +			       struct xfrm_state **best, int *acq_in_progress,
> +			       int *error)
> +{
> +	/* Resolution logic:
> +	 * 1. There is a valid state with matching selector. Done.
> +	 * 2. Valid state with inappropriate selector. Skip.
> +	 *
> +	 * Entering area of "sysdeps".
> +	 *
> +	 * 3. If state is not valid, selector is temporary, it selects
> +	 *    only session which triggered previous resolution. Key
> +	 *    manager will do something to install a state with proper
> +	 *    selector.
> +	 */
> +	if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_VALID) {
> +		if ((x->sel.family &&
> +		     !xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, x->sel.family)) ||
> +		    !security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, pol, fl))
> +			return;
> +
> +		if (!*best ||
> +		    (*best)->km.dying > x->km.dying ||
> +		    ((*best)->km.dying == x->km.dying &&
> +		     (*best)->curlft.add_time < x->curlft.add_time))
> +			*best = x;
> +	} else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ACQ) {
> +		*acq_in_progress = 1;
> +	} else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ERROR ||
> +		   x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_EXPIRED) {
> +		if (xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, x->sel.family) &&
> +		    security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, pol, fl))
> +			*error = -ESRCH;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  struct xfrm_state *
>  xfrm_state_find(xfrm_address_t *daddr, xfrm_address_t *saddr,
>  		struct flowi *fl, struct xfrm_tmpl *tmpl,
>  		struct xfrm_policy *pol, int *err,
>  		unsigned short family)
>  {
> +	static xfrm_address_t saddr_wildcard = { };
>  	struct net *net = xp_net(pol);
>  	unsigned int h;
>  	struct hlist_node *entry;
> @@ -773,38 +812,21 @@ xfrm_state_find(xfrm_address_t *daddr, xfrm_address_t *saddr,
>  		    xfrm_state_addr_check(x, daddr, saddr, family) &&
>  		    tmpl->mode == x->props.mode &&
>  		    tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
> -		    (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi)) {
> -			/* Resolution logic:
> -			   1. There is a valid state with matching selector.
> -			      Done.
> -			   2. Valid state with inappropriate selector. Skip.
> -
> -			   Entering area of "sysdeps".
> -
> -			   3. If state is not valid, selector is temporary,
> -			      it selects only session which triggered
> -			      previous resolution. Key manager will do
> -			      something to install a state with proper
> -			      selector.
> -			 */
> -			if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_VALID) {
> -				if ((x->sel.family && !xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, x->sel.family)) ||
> -				    !security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, pol, fl))
> -					continue;
> -				if (!best ||
> -				    best->km.dying > x->km.dying ||
> -				    (best->km.dying == x->km.dying &&
> -				     best->curlft.add_time < x->curlft.add_time))
> -					best = x;
> -			} else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ACQ) {
> -				acquire_in_progress = 1;
> -			} else if (x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_ERROR ||
> -				   x->km.state == XFRM_STATE_EXPIRED) {
> -				if (xfrm_selector_match(&x->sel, fl, x->sel.family) &&
> -				    security_xfrm_state_pol_flow_match(x, pol, fl))
> -					error = -ESRCH;
> -			}
> -		}
> +		    (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
> +			xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family, daddr, saddr,
> +					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
> +	}
> +	h = xfrm_dst_hash(net, daddr, &saddr_wildcard, tmpl->reqid, family);
> +	hlist_for_each_entry(x, entry, net->xfrm.state_bydst+h, bydst) {
> +		if (x->props.family == family &&
> +		    x->props.reqid == tmpl->reqid &&
> +		    !(x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_WILDRECV) &&
> +		    xfrm_state_addr_check(x, daddr, saddr, family) &&
> +		    tmpl->mode == x->props.mode &&
> +		    tmpl->id.proto == x->id.proto &&
> +		    (tmpl->id.spi == x->id.spi || !tmpl->id.spi))
> +			xfrm_state_look_at(pol, x, fl, family, daddr, saddr,
> +					   &best, &acquire_in_progress, &error);
>  	}
>  
>  	x = best;

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-10 14:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-10  9:46 XFRM state hash value Nicolas Dichtel
2009-03-10 11:20 ` David Miller
2009-03-10 14:08   ` Nicolas Dichtel [this message]
2009-03-10 14:18     ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49B67450.1060002@dev.6wind.com \
    --to=nicolas.dichtel@dev.6wind.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).