From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jesper Krogh <jesper@krogh.cc>
Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected
 - twice
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:34:38 +0100
Message-ID: <49BEB7DE.9000201@krogh.cc>
References: <49AA8B4F.8090405@krogh.cc> <9712.1236279072@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> <49B581D3.6060807@krogh.cc> <20090313.161217.52045656.davem@davemloft.net> <8799.1236986836@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@redhat.com, aowi@novozymes.com
To: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@us.ibm.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from 2605ds1-ynoe.1.fullrate.dk ([90.184.12.24]:38051 "EHLO
	shrek.krogh.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1753511AbZCPUew (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:34:52 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8799.1236986836@death.nxdomain.ibm.com>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> 	The above fragment isn't needed for mainline, only for -stable.
> 

Did you sent it off to the stable kernel maintainers?

-- 
Jesper