From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Holger Eitzenberger <holger@eitzenberger.org>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 0/6] netfilter: ctnetlink allocation improvement
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 10:49:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49BF720C.2010603@netfilter.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090316220659.756862181@jonathan.eitzenberger.org>
Hi Holger,
Holger Eitzenberger wrote:
> what follows is a small patchset against net-next-2.6 which tries to
> improve the way ctnetlink events are allocated. By allocating the
> ctnetlink skbs roughly the size of the message we prevent the skb from
> later being reallocated in netlink_trim().
I have a similar patch here that I sent time ago, I'll send it again, I
think that we can merge your patches and mine.
> Though I haven't got any hard performance numbers yet I think this
> might introduce a noticable performance gain.
I'm not sure about this. Instead, I noticed with oprofile that we spend
more cycles to calculate the message size. I think it's more like a
trade-off, reducing the message size to what we need reduces the chances
to hit ENOBUFS.
> I also have to introduce NF_CT_HELPER_NAME_LEN as an upper limit for
> the conntrack protcol helper names, which is not much of a problem
> because all names in mainline are actually shorter than that.
I'm fine with the helper size change. Actually the current size of 30
bytes doesn't make too much sense.
--
"Los honestos son inadaptados sociales" -- Les Luthiers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-17 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-16 22:06 [patch 0/6] netfilter: ctnetlink allocation improvement Holger Eitzenberger
2009-03-16 22:07 ` [patch 1/6] ctnetlink: add callbacks to the per-proto nlattrs Holger Eitzenberger
2009-03-25 17:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-16 22:07 ` [patch 2/6] netlink: add nla_policy_len() Holger Eitzenberger
2009-03-25 17:27 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-16 22:07 ` [patch 3/6] netfilter: limit the length of the helper name Holger Eitzenberger
2009-03-25 17:32 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-25 17:41 ` Holger Eitzenberger
2009-03-25 17:44 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-16 22:07 ` [patch 4/6] ctnetlink: allocate right-sized ctnetlink skb Holger Eitzenberger
2009-03-25 17:46 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-16 22:07 ` [patch 5/6] netfilter: add generic function to get len of generic policy Holger Eitzenberger
2009-03-16 22:07 ` [patch 6/6] netfilter: calculate per-protocol nlattr size Holger Eitzenberger
2009-03-17 4:35 ` [patch 0/6] netfilter: ctnetlink allocation improvement Patrick McHardy
2009-03-17 7:39 ` Holger Eitzenberger
2009-03-17 9:07 ` Florian Westphal
2009-03-17 10:24 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2009-03-17 9:49 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2009-03-17 10:03 ` Holger Eitzenberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49BF720C.2010603@netfilter.org \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=holger@eitzenberger.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).