From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jesper Krogh Subject: Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6 - bisected - twice Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 21:18:38 +0100 Message-ID: <49C0059E.5050405@krogh.cc> References: <20090313.161217.52045656.davem@davemloft.net> <8799.1236986836@death.nxdomain.ibm.com> <49BEB7DE.9000201@krogh.cc> <20090316.133559.173588446.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: fubar@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgarzik@redhat.com, aowi@novozymes.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from 2605ds1-ynoe.1.fullrate.dk ([90.184.12.24]:45581 "EHLO shrek.krogh.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754111AbZCQUSs (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:18:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090316.133559.173588446.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > From: Jesper Krogh > Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:34:38 +0100 > >> Jay Vosburgh wrote: >>> The above fragment isn't needed for mainline, only for -stable. >>> >> Did you sent it off to the stable kernel maintainers? > > The fix has to go into Linus's tree first. > > I haven't integrated Jay's changes yet. Excellent. I was just trying to make sure that it wasn't lost somewhere in the process. -- Jesper