From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: ucc_geth: nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:15:45 +0100 Message-ID: <49C77D71.8090709@trash.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, avorontsov@ru.mvista.com To: Joakim Tjernlund Return-path: Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:37229 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753922AbZCWMPx (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:15:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > doing a "ping -f -l 3" on my host towards my board on linus tree as of > Friday results in lots of: > nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. > nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. > nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. > __ratelimit: 11 callbacks suppressed > nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. > nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. > nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. > nf_conntrack: table full, dropping packet. > > for ucc_geth on a MPC832x. > This really looks strange to me, ideas? What does /proc/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack show?