From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH] bnx2: Use request_firmware() Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:14:36 -0700 Message-ID: <49C825EC.50100@hp.com> References: <1237501747.4126.10.camel@deadeye.i.decadent.org.uk> <1237503884.16140.23.camel@HP1> <20090319232541.GA19262@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <20090320.155030.164080684.davem@davemloft.net> <1237844879.18617.20.camel@HP1> <20090323222915.GA29609@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> <1237850656.18617.34.camel@HP1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Bastian Blank , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" To: Michael Chan Return-path: Received: from g1t0027.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.34]:43032 "EHLO g1t0027.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751639AbZCXAOj (ORCPT ); Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:14:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1237850656.18617.34.camel@HP1> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Michael Chan wrote: > May be I'll break up each firmware section into a > different file and the file name will be updated with each version. > This will allow different sections to be updated separately and older > kernels will still have access to the older firmware. Is that really necessary? It is enough "fun" finding just the one firmware file as it is. rick jones