From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network Device Naming mechanism and policy
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:21:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49C9087C.5070907@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090324154617.GA16332@auslistsprd01.us.dell.com>
Matt Domsch wrote:
> 2) udev may have rules to change the device names. This is most often
> seen in the '70-persistent-net.rules' file. Here we have
> additional challenges:
>
> ...
>
> c) udev may not always be able to change a device's name. If udev
> uses the kernel assignment namespace (ethN), then a rename of
> eth0->eth1 may require renaming eth1->eth0 (or something else).
> Udev operates on a single device instance at a time, it becomes
> difficult to switch names around for multiple devices, within
> the single namespace.
I would classify this as a bug, especially the fact that udev doesn't
undo a failed rename, so you end up with ethX_rename. Virtual devices
using the same MAC address trigger this reliably unless you add
exceptions to the udev rules.
You state that it only operates on one device at a time. If that is
correct, I'm not sure why the _rename suffix is used at all instead
of simply trying to assign the final name, which would avoid this
problem.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-24 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-24 15:46 Network Device Naming mechanism and policy Matt Domsch
2009-03-24 16:21 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-03-24 16:28 ` Kay Sievers
2009-03-24 16:38 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-24 16:40 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-24 17:00 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-24 17:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-24 18:51 ` david
2009-03-24 21:02 ` Alan Cox
2009-03-24 23:14 ` Greg KH
2009-03-24 16:42 ` Karl O. Pinc
2009-03-24 17:45 ` Matt Domsch
2009-03-24 17:02 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-03-24 17:52 ` Matt Domsch
2009-03-24 18:12 ` Bill Nottingham
2009-03-24 18:20 ` Scott James Remnant
2009-03-24 18:49 ` david
2009-03-24 19:22 ` Matt Domsch
2009-03-24 22:57 ` David Miller
2009-03-25 20:22 ` Chris Friesen
2009-03-26 20:17 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-26 16:39 ` Matt Domsch
2009-03-26 20:16 ` Dan Williams
2009-03-27 16:06 ` Len Brown
2009-04-09 14:58 ` Matt Domsch
2009-03-31 14:07 ` Kurt Van Dijck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49C9087C.5070907@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=Matt_Domsch@dell.com \
--cc=linux-hotplug@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).