From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: Re: [RFC] net: release dst entry in dev_queue_xmit() Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 21:28:37 +0100 Message-ID: <49CA93F5.0@cosmosbay.com> References: <49C380A6.4000904@cosmosbay.com> <20090324.234354.43714160.davem@davemloft.net> <49C9D99A.2040900@cosmosbay.com> <20090325.001720.238121238.davem@davemloft.net> <49CA7658.4010400@gmail.com> <49CA7AD7.8040401@cosmosbay.com> <20090325191850.GA2928@ami.dom.local> <49CA8895.8020105@cosmosbay.com> <20090325195424.GB2928@ami.dom.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: David Miller , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Jarek Poplawski Return-path: Received: from gw1.cosmosbay.com ([212.99.114.194]:58679 "EHLO gw1.cosmosbay.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754071AbZCYU2s convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:28:48 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20090325195424.GB2928@ami.dom.local> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jarek Poplawski a =E9crit : > I guess you've considered the loopback too... >=20 I had for the first patch (carefuly avoiding loopback being not respons= ive) : I was releasing dst only if enqueue() was called. You are right, loopback doesnt work anymore with last patch, and I have no idea why... Do you know why ? Thank you