From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu Subject: Re: [PATCH] sh_eth: Change handling of IRQ Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:58:23 +0900 Message-ID: <49D16AAF.4080803@renesas.com> References: <49BF3A97.4010008@renesas.com> <49BF3A41.6040309@renesas.com> <20090330231513.GG19535@linux-sh.org> <20090330231623.GH19535@linux-sh.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Paul Mundt , Nobuhiro Iwamatsu , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux-sh Return-path: In-reply-to: <20090330231623.GH19535@linux-sh.org> Sender: linux-sh-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Paul Mundt wrote: > On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 08:15:13AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:50:57PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >>> Handling of IRQ of the SH7763/SH7764 CPU which sh_eth supported was >>> changed. >>> This revises it for this change. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 02:52:23PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >>> Address of SH_TSU_ADDR and ARSTR of SH7763 was wrong. >>> This revise it. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu >> The sh changes this depends on for the CPU subtypes are merged upstream >> now, so this can go through either tree. As there is nothing really >> netdev specific about this, I suppose the easiest is to just roll both of >> these in to the sh tree. > > Oh, nevermind, I see these were merged already through the net tree.. > I should have reported that these were taken in. I will report it from the next time. Best regards, Nobuhiro