From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
nhorman@tuxdriver.com, zbr@ioremap.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@namei.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 4/5] Network Drop Monitor: Adding drop monitor implementation & Netlink protocol
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2009 17:14:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D4D66A.50101@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090402150908.GA1382@gondor.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 05:06:40PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>> Yes, that should always work. For new stuff I think we should try
>> to avoid encapsulating larger structures in single attributes though
>> since it forces us to do copy everything, instead of just the types
>> that really require it (and the padding issues in case of at least
>> non-priviledged interfaces).
>
> Are there any situations where we want to use a struct? Perhaps
> we can just ban it altogether for new code?
I'd prefer that as well. The only reason to do this is to save a few
bytes and cycles for attribute encapsulation. I don't think this
matters at all, judging by the fact that I've never seen a userspace
implementation using message batching, the current users don't seem
to care about performance *that* much.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-02 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-03 17:04 [Patch 4/5] Network Drop Monitor: Adding drop monitor implementation & Netlink protocol Neil Horman
2009-03-03 18:19 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-03-03 19:21 ` Neil Horman
2009-03-03 22:14 ` David Miller
2009-03-03 22:16 ` David Miller
2009-03-04 10:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-03-04 11:00 ` David Miller
2009-04-02 9:39 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-02 9:50 ` David Miller
2009-04-02 9:52 ` David Miller
2009-04-02 9:59 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-02 14:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-02 14:45 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-02 14:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-02 14:59 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-02 15:06 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-02 15:09 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-02 15:14 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2009-04-02 15:30 ` Herbert Xu
2009-04-05 9:59 ` David Miller
2009-04-06 13:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-06-10 8:08 ` David Miller
2009-06-10 10:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-04-05 9:57 ` David Miller
2009-04-05 9:56 ` David Miller
2009-04-05 9:54 ` David Miller
2009-03-04 11:44 ` Neil Horman
2009-03-05 19:27 ` Neil Horman
2009-03-11 16:17 ` David Miller
2009-03-11 19:51 ` Neil Horman
2009-03-13 19:10 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49D4D66A.50101@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
--cc=zbr@ioremap.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).