From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:50:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E78C1E.9060405@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49E78A79.6050604@cosmosbay.com>
Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Christoph Lameter a écrit :
>> The following are results of lantency measurements using udpping
>> (available from http://gentwo.org/ll). It shows that significant latencies
>> were added since 2.6.27. I surely wish we could get back to times below 90
>> microseconds.
>>
>> The tests were done over 1G ethernet using
>> 09:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5754
>> Gigabit Ethernet PCI Express (rev 02)
>>
>> Results:
>>
>> 2.6.22 2.6.23 2.6.24 2.6.25 2.6.26 2.6.27 2.6.28 2.6.29
>> 40 Bytes 89.50 90.75 89.61 91.51 91.89 99.17 99.80 99.34
>> 400 Bytes 98.58 101.44 97.85 99.61 100.36 117.96 118.10 126.79
>> 1400 Bytes 152.76 153.75 153.85 156.22 156.66 163.92 165.54 166.04
>>
>> Compared to 2.6.22 2.6.23 2.6.24 2.6.25 2.6.26 2.6.27 2.6.28 2.6.29
>> 40 Bytes -1.4% -0.1% -2.2% -2.6% -9.8% -10.3% -9.9%
>> 400 Bytes -2.8% 0.7% -1.0% -1.8% -16.4% -16.5%-22.2%
>> 1400 Bytes -0.6% -0.7% -2.2% -2.5% -6.8% -7.7% -8.0%
>>
>> I presented these numbers with some nice graphs at the Linux Collab Summit
>> last week.
>>
>> See
>> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/christoph/collab-spring-2009/Collab-summit-2009-sf.pdf
>>
>
> Is it a bnx2 or tg3 driver ?
>
> copybreak feature could explain a regression for small packets, since
> an extra copy is done.
>
> It would be sane to always set on both machines :
> ethtool -C eth0 rx-usecs 0 rx-frames 1
> prior to your tests...
>
Also you might check /proc/interrupts, because recent linux versions are
distributing interrupts on all cpus instead of one on previous version
Old kernel :
# grep eth1 /proc/interrupts
58: 25754498 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCI-MSI eth1
New kernel :
# grep eth1 /proc/interrupts
221: 16476622 16478581 16478007 16478793 16478237 16472191 16474083 16476374 PCI-MSI-edge eth1
(and /proc/irq/221/smp_affinity is not taken into account on some NICS)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-16 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 16:10 Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 17:21 ` Rick Jones
2009-04-16 19:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 19:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 19:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 22:47 ` David Miller
2009-04-17 13:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-17 21:43 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2009-04-16 20:05 ` Rick Jones
2009-04-16 18:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-04-16 19:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 21:19 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-04-16 22:47 ` David Miller
2009-04-16 19:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 19:50 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-04-16 20:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 23:00 ` David Miller
2009-04-17 16:42 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 (results with IRQ affinity) Christoph Lameter
2009-04-18 8:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-18 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-18 19:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 17:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 17:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 18:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 18:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 19:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 20:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 21:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-21 14:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-21 19:36 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 (MSI off) Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 19:44 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 (results with IRQ affinity) Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-04-16 19:55 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 21:57 ` Michael Chan
2009-04-17 13:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 22:59 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49E78C1E.9060405@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).