netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Badalian Vyacheslav <slavon@bigtelecom.ru>
To: Radu Rendec <radu.rendec@ines.ro>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: htb parallelism on multi-core platforms
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 15:33:36 +0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49E86910.7020804@bigtelecom.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1239964844.21569.57.camel@blade.ines.ro>

hello

100% SI on ksoftirqd on one CPU because PC can't forward such packets
(napi off if i understand). 2 cpu xeon 2.4 ghz can forward about 400-500
mbs full duplex with about 20-30k htb rules. If we try do more - we get
100% SI. Its our example.

We now use multiple pc for this and will try to by intel 10G with A/IO
that can use Multiqueue.

Anyone can say:
How match CPU we must have for about 5-7G in/out with 2 x intel 10G +
A/IO (1x10g to lan + 1x10g to wan) ?
Any statistic or formula to calculate? pps or mbs?
tc + iptables (+ipset) now use 10-30%. All other cpu now use e1000e driver.

Thanks

> Hi,
>
> I'm using htb on a dedicated shaping machine. Under heavy traffic (high
> packet rate) all htb work is done on a single cpu - only one ksoftirqd
> is consuming cpu power.
>
> I have limited network stack knowledge, but I guess all htb work for a
> particular interface is done on the same softirq context. Of course this
> does not scale with multiple cpus, since only one of them would be used.
>
> Is there any (simple) approach to distribute htb work (for one
> interface) on multiple cpus?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Radu Rendec
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>   


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-04-17 11:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-17 10:40 htb parallelism on multi-core platforms Radu Rendec
2009-04-17 11:31 ` David Miller
2009-04-17 11:33 ` Badalian Vyacheslav [this message]
2009-04-17 22:41 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-18  0:21   ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-04-18  7:56     ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-22 14:02       ` Radu Rendec
2009-04-22 21:29         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-04-23  8:20           ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-23 13:56             ` Radu Rendec
2009-04-23 18:19               ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-23 20:19                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-04-24  9:42                   ` Radu Rendec
2009-04-28 10:15                     ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-04-29 10:21                       ` Radu Rendec
2009-04-29 10:31                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-04-29 11:03                           ` Radu Rendec
2009-04-29 12:23                             ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-29 13:15                               ` Radu Rendec
2009-04-29 13:38                                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-29 16:21                                   ` Radu Rendec
2009-04-29 22:49                                     ` Calin Velea
2009-04-29 23:00                                       ` Re[2]: " Calin Velea
2009-04-30 11:19                                       ` Radu Rendec
2009-04-30 11:44                                         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-04-30 14:04                                         ` Re[2]: " Calin Velea
2009-05-08 10:15                                           ` Paweł Staszewski
2009-05-08 17:55                                             ` Vladimir Ivashchenko
2009-05-08 18:07                                               ` Denys Fedoryschenko
2009-04-23 12:31           ` Radu Rendec
2009-04-23 18:43             ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-23 19:06               ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-04-23 19:14                 ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-23 19:47                   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2009-04-23 20:00                     ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-23 20:09                     ` Jeff King
2009-04-24  6:01               ` Jarek Poplawski
     [not found]             ` <1039493214.20090424135024@gemenii.ro>
2009-04-24 11:19               ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-24 11:35             ` Re[2]: " Calin Velea

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49E86910.7020804@bigtelecom.ru \
    --to=slavon@bigtelecom.ru \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=radu.rendec@ines.ro \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).