From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Michael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 (results with IRQ affinity)
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 19:57:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49ECB775.6030202@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0904201305360.1585@qirst.com>
Christoph Lameter a écrit :
> On Sat, 18 Apr 2009, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>> I did my tests with 3 machines, trying to reproduce your results and failed.
>
> Ow.... Where are the results? Seems that you only included the results of
> traces? The numbers would be much higher with udpping since it measures
> the full round trip time from user space of one machine to the other and
> back. The code segment that you are tracing may not be relevant.
>
>> I only took traces on receivers to rule out different coalescing delays
>> of NIC that could depend on firmware or version
>
> Hmmm... Okay there could be a firmware influence....
>
>> bnx2 driver statically included in vmlinux.
>> (on newkernel, its "disable_msi" set to 1 (because this is the only way my BCM5708S can
>> have interrupt affinities set by the admin used by the hardware on 2.6.28+)
>
> Here bnx2 is a module and MSI is enabled after it became available
> (2.6.27+). Affinities seem to be effective after resetting the driver.
Hmm, I am not sure I can do that, I would loose my ssh connection...
>
>> If I force udpping to same cpu than IRQS (CPU0) I get : 7us, 8us, 7us, 7us
>> And yes, this is very good and expected IMHO :)
>
> Sounds very good. If I just knew what you are measuring.
Rephrasing my email, I was measuring latencies on the receiving machine,
by using tcpdump and doing substraction of 'answer_time' and 'request_time'
Thing is that timestamps dont care about hardware delays.
(we note time when RX interrupt delivers the packet, and time right before giving frame to hardware)
21:04:23.780421 IP 192.168.20.112.9001 > 192.168.20.110.9000: UDP, length 300 (request)
21:04:23.780428 IP 192.168.20.110.9000 > 192.168.20.112.9001: UDP, length 300 (answer)
Here, [21:04:23.780428 - 21:04:23.780421] = 7 us
So my results are extensively published :)
>
>> In conclusion, something might be wrong in your methodology, or your hardware, or...
>
> Cannot really say since the results are not published? We can retry this
> by making sure that udpping runs on the same processor as the IRQ.
>
>> Please Christoph, would you mind posting more information on your config ?
>
> Sure.
>
> Dell PowerEdge 1950
> http://www1.ap.dell.com/content/products/productdetails.aspx/pedge_1950?c=au&cs=aubsd1&l=en&s=bsd
>
>> Any chance you have CONFIG_PREEMT enabled or any expensive kernel debug thing ?
>
> Nope. Even if so: Would that not be offset by running the same kernel
> version?
I dont know, it was a random thought of mine, since I had in the past bad results
if this one was enabled. This might had changed.
>
> CONFIG_HPET_TIMER=y
> CONFIG_HPET_EMULATE_RTC=y
> CONFIG_NR_CPUS=32
> CONFIG_SCHED_SMT=y
OK, I had "# CONFIG_SCHED_SMT is not set"
I'll try with this option set
> CONFIG_SCHED_MC=y
> CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set
> # CONFIG_PREEMPT_BKL is not set
> CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC=y
>
> #
> # Kernel hacking
> #
> CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS_SUPPORT=y
> # CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME is not set
> CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK=y
> CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ=y
> CONFIG_UNUSED_SYMBOLS=y
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not set
> # CONFIG_HEADERS_CHECK is not set
> CONFIG_DEBUG_KERNEL=y
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_SHIRQ is not set
> CONFIG_DETECT_SOFTLOCKUP=y
> # CONFIG_SCHEDSTATS is not set
> # CONFIG_TIMER_STATS is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_SLAB is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES is not set
> # CONFIG_RT_MUTEX_TESTER is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC is not set
> # CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK_SLEEP is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKING_API_SELFTESTS is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM is not set
> CONFIG_DEBUG_BUGVERBOSE=y
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_VM is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_LIST is not set
> # CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER is not set
> # CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING is not set
> # CONFIG_RCU_TORTURE_TEST is not set
> # CONFIG_LKDTM is not set
> # CONFIG_FAULT_INJECTION is not set
> CONFIG_EARLY_PRINTK=y
> CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW=y
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_STACK_USAGE is not set
> # CONFIG_DEBUG_RODATA is not set
> # CONFIG_4KSTACKS is not set
> CONFIG_X86_FIND_SMP_CONFIG=y
> CONFIG_X86_MPPARSE=y
> CONFIG_DOUBLEFAULT=y
>
Are you running a 32 or 64 bits kernel ?
Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-20 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-16 16:10 Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 17:21 ` Rick Jones
2009-04-16 19:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 19:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 19:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 22:47 ` David Miller
2009-04-17 13:46 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-17 21:43 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2009-04-16 20:05 ` Rick Jones
2009-04-16 18:07 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-04-16 19:02 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 21:19 ` Ben Hutchings
2009-04-16 22:47 ` David Miller
2009-04-16 19:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 19:50 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-16 20:01 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 23:00 ` David Miller
2009-04-17 16:42 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 (results with IRQ affinity) Christoph Lameter
2009-04-18 8:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-18 8:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-18 19:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 17:29 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 17:57 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-04-20 18:13 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 18:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 19:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 20:07 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-20 21:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 21:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-21 14:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-21 19:36 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 (MSI off) Christoph Lameter
2009-04-20 19:44 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 (results with IRQ affinity) Evgeniy Polyakov
2009-04-16 19:55 ` Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 21:57 ` Michael Chan
2009-04-17 13:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-16 22:59 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49ECB775.6030202@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).