netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	cl@linux.com, jesse.brandeburg@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	haoki@redhat.com, mchan@broadcom.com, davidel@xmailserver.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] poll: Avoid extra wakeups
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 16:58:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49F7199C.6080700@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ab60rh8t.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>

Andi Kleen a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> writes:
>> When scheduled, thread does a full scan of all polled fds and
>> can sleep again, because nothing is really available. If number
>> of fds is large, this cause significant load.
> 
> I wonder if the key could be used for more state. For example if you
> two processes are in recvmsg() on a socket and there's only a single
> packet incoming we only need to wake up the first waiter.  Could that
> be done with keys too?

I am not sure its possible. I'll take a look.

> 
>> This patch makes select()/poll() aware of keyed wakeups and
>> useless wakeups are avoided. This reduces number of context
>> switches by about 50% on some setups, and work performed
>> by sofirq handlers.
> 
> I'm late, but: very cool patch too.
> 
> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>

Thanks, I am going to send it again on lkml this time :)


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-28 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-24 20:10 udp ping pong with various process bindings (and correct cpu mappings) Christoph Lameter
2009-04-24 21:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-25 15:47 ` [PATCH] net: Avoid extra wakeups of threads blocked in wait_for_packet() Eric Dumazet
2009-04-26  9:04   ` David Miller
2009-04-26 10:46     ` [PATCH] poll: Avoid extra wakeups Eric Dumazet
2009-04-26 13:33       ` Jarek Poplawski
2009-04-26 14:27         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28  9:15       ` David Miller
2009-04-28  9:24         ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 14:21       ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 14:58         ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-04-28 15:06         ` [PATCH] poll: Avoid extra wakeups in select/poll Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 19:05           ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-28 20:05             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 20:14               ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-28 20:33                 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 20:49                   ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-28 21:04                     ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 21:00                       ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-28 21:05                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-28 21:04                         ` Christoph Lameter
2009-04-28 21:11                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29  9:11                         ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-30 10:49                           ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-30 11:57                             ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-30 14:08                               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-30 16:07                                 ` [BUG] perf_counter: change cpu frequencies Eric Dumazet
2009-05-03  6:06                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-03  7:25                                     ` Ingo Molnar
2009-05-04 10:39                                       ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-30 21:24                                 ` [PATCH] poll: Avoid extra wakeups in select/poll Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-29  7:20           ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-29  7:35             ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-29  7:37               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29  9:22               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29  7:39             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29  8:26               ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29  9:16           ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29  9:36             ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29 10:27               ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 12:29                 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-04-29 13:07                   ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-29 15:53                   ` Davide Libenzi
2009-04-28  9:26   ` [PATCH] net: Avoid extra wakeups of threads blocked in wait_for_packet() David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49F7199C.6080700@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
    --cc=haoki@redhat.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=mchan@broadcom.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).