From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Andrew Dickinson <andrew@whydna.net>,
jelaas@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: skb_tx_hash() improvements
Date: Fri, 01 May 2009 11:29:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49FAC112.6090808@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49FAB831.6020700@cosmosbay.com>
Eric Dumazet a écrit :
> Eric Dumazet a écrit :
>> David, here is the followup I promised
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> [PATCH] net: skb_tx_hash() improvements
>>
>> When skb_rx_queue_recorded() is true, we dont want to use jhash distribution
>> as the device driver exactly told us which queue was selected at RX time.
>> jhash makes a statistical shuffle, but this wont work with only 8 different inputs.
>>
>> We also need to implement a true reciprocal division, to not disturb
>> symmetric setups (when number of tx queues matches number of rx queues)
>> and cpu affinities.
>>
>> This patch introduces a new helper, dev_real_num_tx_queues_set()
>> to set both real_num_tx_queues and its reciprocal value,
>> and makes all drivers use this helper.
>
> Oh well, this was wrong, I took divide result while we want a modulo !
>
> Need to think a litle bit more :)
>
So no need of a true reciprocal divide, just a refinement of first patch.
(Avoiding the divide if possible)
If incoming device has 4 rx queues, and outgoing device has 8 queues,
only 4 of tx queues are used, I wonder if we need some further improvement
here to better use all available tx queues ? Probably not in generic code...
[PATCH] net: skb_tx_hash() improvement
When skb_rx_queue_recorded() is true, we dont want to use jhash distribution
as the device driver exactly told us which queue was selected at RX time.
jhash makes a statistical shuffle, but this wont work with only 8 different inputs.
Same thing for the 'modulo' operation, that works only if inputs are
enough random (ie use all available 32 bits)
This patch avoids jhash computation (which cost ~50 instructions), but might
still need a modulo operation, in case number of tx queues is smaller
than number of rx queues.
Reported-by: Andrew Dickinson <andrew@whydna.net>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
---
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 308a7d0..b3acb51 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -1737,9 +1737,19 @@ u16 skb_tx_hash(const struct net_device *dev, const struct sk_buff *skb)
if (skb_rx_queue_recorded(skb)) {
hash = skb_get_rx_queue(skb);
- } else if (skb->sk && skb->sk->sk_hash) {
+ /*
+ * Try to avoid an expensive divide, for symmetric setups :
+ * number of tx queues of output device ==
+ * number of rx queues of incoming device
+ */
+ if (hash >= dev->real_num_tx_queues)
+ hash %= dev->real_num_tx_queues;
+ return hash;
+ }
+
+ if (skb->sk && skb->sk->sk_hash)
hash = skb->sk->sk_hash;
- } else
+ else
hash = skb->protocol;
hash = jhash_1word(hash, skb_tx_hashrnd);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-01 9:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-29 23:00 tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe) Andrew Dickinson
2009-04-30 9:07 ` Jens Låås
2009-04-30 9:24 ` David Miller
2009-04-30 10:51 ` Jens Låås
2009-04-30 11:05 ` David Miller
2009-04-30 14:04 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-04-30 14:08 ` David Miller
2009-04-30 23:53 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01 4:19 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01 7:32 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 7:47 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 6:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 6:19 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01 6:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 7:23 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01 7:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 7:34 ` Andrew Dickinson
2009-05-01 21:37 ` Brandeburg, Jesse
2009-05-01 8:29 ` [PATCH] net: skb_tx_hash() improvements Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 8:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 9:29 ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2009-05-01 16:17 ` David Miller
2009-05-03 21:44 ` David Miller
2009-05-04 6:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 16:08 ` tx queue hashing hot-spots and poor performance (multiq, ixgbe) David Miller
2009-05-01 16:48 ` Eric Dumazet
2009-05-01 17:22 ` David Miller
2009-05-01 10:20 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49FAC112.6090808@cosmosbay.com \
--to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
--cc=andrew@whydna.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jelaas@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).